Believe what you want, as I said, been there seen that.
Maybe you could provide an example of a corporation being more successful then another when run by an individual who willfully commits acts of violence, engages in threatening behavior towards those around them, and in general skews the rules to reward themselves disproportionately and with out regard for shareholder value.
Since you seem to believe that such behavior is acceptable in places like public companies.
“an individual who willfully commits acts of violence, engages in threatening behavior towards those around them, and in general skews the rules to reward themselves disproportionately and with out regard for shareholder value”
Ah, but that’s your personal definition, not the actual clinical definition of the type of person we’re talking about. So I’m not playing that game.
The fact is, if sociopaths running corporations led to the corporation failing, then the problem would have solved itself long ago and we wouldn’t be discussing it. We are discussing it, therefore that cannot have happened.