This is a test...
How are these 2 documents related? (or unrelated)
1085PG supersedes 0891D and 0866D - where does 1001D come in?
or...in other words...
what does this mean, exactly?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I only had time to skim it and wanted to put it out there in case others could contribute info.
I believe 1085PG is overarching and defines the persons to whom the FBI’s policies applies to and their specific responsibilities.
It looked like 1001D is one of the many policies under the 1085PG umbrella. SO the two taken together, if I understand skimmed content, could be used to say, “Per 1085PG, this specific FBI appointee/employee had a clearly defined responsibility to uphold and enforce this set of agency policies (1085PG), and we will put before the court evidence that he/she knowingly and willfully violated this specific policy (1001D) which concerns the maintenance of investigatory records in their original format.
Every time the FBI created or altered its investigation documents (e.g., fake 302’s which Powell had exposed in Flynn’s trial), specific people in the FBI were responsible for the violation(s). The DS FBI did this so often, there must be quite a bit of evidence that they faked investigation information on the fly by saying they rewrote their interview notes, or places where prior versions of 302’s don’t match latter versions of 302s.
So the “dog ate my homework” and “I forgot” or “I don’t have those records anymore” all violate specific policies for which specific people are responsible, whether they were directly implicated or not (”I didn’t sign it”, “I never told him to do that”, “I was unaware...”)
This deceased writer/publisher of a well known magazine that still runs was also known for having a television show. His manner and speaking style were mocked on sketch comedy shows many times. He preferred sexual relations with men rather than with women but like a lot of men of his generation he could not acknowledge this and so married and had children. In addition, the audience he cultivated would not have accepted this.
He spent a lot of time with homosexual prostitutes from a specific procurer. He would often tell his favorites that he would refer to them on his TV show by assigning them an obscure word, Latin or old English, and then use the word on his show that week.
I always did think his mannerisms were those of a Limey Poofter.
And -- he was the one who started the whole "losing gracefully" "that's not who we are" and threw the actually conservative groups like John Birchers under the bus under the rubric of (rolls eyes into next *state*) -- "rayciss".
NO surprise, then, that he was recently revealed to have been CIA, right?
thanks...I get it...i think...