Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

NOW: Hubei province, epicenter of the coronavirus outbreak, is reporting 15 additional deaths and 180 new cases

https://twitter.com/BNODesk/status/1220831432462995461

1 posted on 01/24/2020 2:28:22 PM PST by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: janetjanet998
Dr. Eric Feigl-Ding, is calling it pandemic like the 1918 Spanish Influenza. Twitter Link to Dr Feigl-Ding post
460 posted on 01/24/2020 9:10:01 PM PST by DEPcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; ...

p


491 posted on 01/24/2020 9:45:56 PM PST by bitt (A government afraid of its citizens should be afraid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998; All
For those interested in decon related measures:

MERS, SARS, and emerging Coronaviruses: theoretical considerations and a proposal for critical care parenteral oxygen/ozone therapy

Ozone room sterilizers are affordable, however the monitoring instruments are not.
502 posted on 01/24/2020 10:01:29 PM PST by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the Occupation Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

The Chinese are now admitting to 41 dead.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/china-virus-toll-hits-41-australia-reports-first-four-cases/ar-BBZj2Dm?ocid=spartanntp


544 posted on 01/25/2020 4:02:06 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

Excellent thing that our universities are, oh I dunno, 35% Chinese!


555 posted on 01/25/2020 5:20:36 AM PST by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

Live look at Hong Kong. Heavy police presence in Mongkok. People are chanting. Trouble is brewing.

https://ncehk2019.github.io/nce-live/?visibleCount=9


569 posted on 01/25/2020 6:06:20 AM PST by HK_Kai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

Thread has fallen off my sidebar. Seems like there should be some way to keep it as breaking or at least extended news...? Can the Mods do that?


574 posted on 01/25/2020 6:25:34 AM PST by Paul R. (The Lib / Socialist goal: Total control of nothing left worth controlling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Hong Kong Police just shot teargas into the crowd in MongKok on the first day of Chinese New Year!

https://www.facebook.com/pg/RTHKVNEWS/videos/?ref=page_internal


585 posted on 01/25/2020 7:03:29 AM PST by HK_Kai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

Anyone looking for n95 masks, Home Depot have them at a better price than amazon (when available).


614 posted on 01/25/2020 7:58:24 AM PST by hardspunned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

The Austin, TX CBS 10 o’clock news said the 3 Texas patients awaiting test results are self isolating. That’s at home rather than in the hospital. A spokesperson stated that isolation means they shouldn’t “spend too much time in crowds.”

TOO MUCH TIME IN CROWDS?!?!?!?!?


638 posted on 01/25/2020 8:51:39 AM PST by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

Later.


682 posted on 01/25/2020 10:40:08 AM PST by hdbc (FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

I have not read every post (it is being updated too fast to keep up) but I have notice there are some claiming this is all hype.

Maybe they are correct, maybe it is much ado about nothing.

But if it is, please explain to me why China would do it in such a way to harm their economy the most?

Most governments try to downplay things like this rather than take a major economic hit. Why would North Korea close it’s borders with China?

I think the next clue will be if other nations begin to stop incoming flights from China.

I don’t believe their (China) word but I do believe the the actions they are taking to control the spread of this virus.


688 posted on 01/25/2020 10:56:49 AM PST by CIB-173RDABN (I am not an expert in anything, and my opinion is just that, an opinion. I may be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998
What is scary they are only showing 39 people fully recover, and 42 death. So the 1357 still sick people with Coronavirus have a 50/50 recover/death.

I guess it takes a while to recover from the illness.

You would think since they first started tracking some of those still sick would have move to the fully recover list but have not. outbreak map
693 posted on 01/25/2020 11:02:42 AM PST by DEPcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

bump


706 posted on 01/25/2020 11:22:48 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (Ban Carbon Dioxide! It's twice as bad as Carbon Monoxide!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

Numbers have changed.

1497
cases

42
deaths

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3047613/china-coronavirus-wuhan-residents-describe-doomsday-scenes


737 posted on 01/25/2020 11:55:54 AM PST by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

thank you


758 posted on 01/25/2020 12:53:07 PM PST by Chickensoup (Voter ID for 2020!! Leftists totalitarian fascists appear to be planning to eradicate conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998
New video from Wuhan. Is there a way to secure this video before youtube deletes it. Link to Youtube video
775 posted on 01/25/2020 1:31:52 PM PST by DEPcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

Scientist who simulated the global impact of a coronavirus outbreak says ‘the cat’s already out of the bag’ and calls China’s efforts to contain the disease ‘unlikely to be effective’

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3810949/posts


802 posted on 01/25/2020 2:20:38 PM PST by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

A Twitter thread by Dr Eric Ding (this guy starts off a bit hysterical).

(I have no idea who this guy is, or how legitimate his studies are.....just posting for info...)

Dr. Eric Feigl-Ding
@DrEricDing
Public health scientist/ Epidemiologist / Health Economist / Science advocacy / Taught for 15 years at Harvard / NYT-featured pharma whistleblower
Jan. 25, 2020 3 min read

HOLY MOTHER OF GOD - the new coronavirus is a 3.8!!! How bad is that reproductive R0 value? It is thermonuclear pandemic level bad - never seen an actual virality coefficient outside of Twitter in my entire career. I’m not exaggerating... #WuhanCoronovirus #CoronavirusOutbreak

2/ “We estimate the basic reproduction number of the infection (R_0) to be 3.8 (95% confidence interval, 3.6-4.0), indicating that 72-75% of transmissions must be prevented by control measures for infections to stop increasing...

3/ ... We estimate that only 5.1% (95%CI, 4.8-5.5) of infections in Wuhan are identified, and by 21 January a total of 11,341 people (prediction interval, 9,217-14,245) had been infected in Wuhan since the start of the year. Should the epidemic continue unabated in Wuhan....

4/ we predict the epidemic in Wuhan will be substantially larger by 4 February (191,529 infections; prediction interval, 132,751-273,649), infection will be established in other Chinese cities, and importations to other countries will be more frequent. Our model suggests that..

5/ travel restrictions from and to Wuhan city are unlikely to be effective in halting transmission across China; with a 99% effective reduction in travel, the size of the epidemic outside of Wuhan may only be reduced by 24.9% on 4 February. Our findings are...

6/ ...critically dependent on the assumptions underpinning our model, and the timing and reporting of confirmed cases, and there is considerable uncertainty associated with the outbreak at this early stage. With these caveats in mind, our work suggests that...

7/ a basic reproductive number for this 2019-nCoV outbreak is higher compared to other emergent coronaviruses, suggesting that containment or control of this pathogen may be substantially more difficult.”!!!! #wuhanvirus #CoronavirusOutbreak #ChinaCoronaVirus ...

8/ ... SUMMARY: so what does this mean for the world??? We are now faced with the most virulent virus epidemic the world has ever seen. An R0=3.8 means that it exceeds SARS’s modest 0.49 viral attack rate by 7.75x — almost 8 fold! A virus that spreads 8 faster than SARS...

9/ ...cannot be stopped by containment alone. A 99% quarantine lockdown containment of Wuhan will not even reduce the epidemic’s spread by even 1/3rd in the next 2 weeks. Thus, I really hate to be the epidemiologist who has to admit this, but we are potentially faced with...

10\ ... possibly an unchecked pandemic that the world has not seen since the 1918 Spanish Influenza. Let’s hope it doesn’t reach that level but we now live in the modern world with faster planes/trains.. than 1918. @WHO and @CDCgov needs to declare public health emergency ASAP!

11/ REFERENCE for the R0 attack rate (reproductive coefficient) of 3.8 and the 99% containment models come from this paper: medrxiv.org/content/10.110…

12/ What is the typical R0 attack rate for the seasonal flu in most years? It’s around an R0=1.28. The 2009 flu pandemic? R0=1.48. The 1918 Spanish Flu? 1.80. This new #WuhanCoronavirus reproductive value again? R0=3.8. (Flu reference: bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.11…)

13/ ...and it gets even worse, the Lancet now reports that the coronavirus is contagious even when *no symptoms*: specifically: “crucial to isolate patients... quarantine contacts as early as possible because asymptomatic infection appears possible”! scmp.com/news/china/soc…

14/ Let’s pretend the 3.8 estimate is too high (there’s unpublished estimates of 2.5). even if this virus’s R0=2.5, that’s still 2x higher than seasonal flu’s 1.28 (ref above), and higher than 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic of 1.80 that killed millions. So 2.8 is still super bad folks

You can follow @DrEricDing.

~~~~~

Again...posting for reference.


804 posted on 01/25/2020 2:27:23 PM PST by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: janetjanet998

https://twitter.com/detresfa_/status/1221192328552927232?s=19

Video from #Wuhan showing the arrival of military medial teams during the night #coronoavirus #WuhanCoronavirus #China USE-FULL-LINK-Yh0suUHfvi


827 posted on 01/25/2020 2:46:24 PM PST by Battle Hymn of the Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson