Q encouraged the Trial scenario, as the landing for bringing in the cascade of Exposure against the Coup scheme.
Did Q confine the “Trial” scenario to a typical legal Court Room? Q remains silent on this issue concerning the atypical scenario of a “political” exercise, known as a US Senate Trial on Impeachment.
We don’t really know how to react to the Senate calling Witnesses. It could be a good thing for Q+.
Or, is it a clever pre-planned trap, set to deny Trump of due process under the law, required in the typical Court Room and away from the “political” exercise occurring in the Senate?
We are hanging in a gap, here. Trump has been both “For” and “against” Senate calling witnesses and Q remains silent on the Senate Trial. Which, makes me think this is already handled, by Q+.
I like your analysis or roundup or whatever it may be called.
Well outlined... what a show :)
My guess:
The Senate will declare the articles and the process invalid, due to the RATs not even following their own rules, nevermind the precedents laid down by prior impeachments.
The subpoenas the White House didn't respond to, were invalid, since the House didn't vote to authorize them. I believe the entire "impeachment" debacle proceeded without an authorizing vote of the entire body. Not to mention is there any mention in the articles, of a crime or "impeachable offense".