[thoughtomator]

Another reason why she is the only Dem candidate to fear. Public support for this consistently runs well over 60%.

[Berlin_Freeper]

More opportunities for the rest of us.

[Leaning Right]

Be careful there, Rep. Gabbard. There is a saying. What you subsidize you will get more of. I propose a related saying. What you legalize you will get more of.

As for me, I prefer the Singapore approach.

[LukeL]

Drugs are already legal in the US, they just require a license. What no one talks about is if and when we no longer schedule narcotics what will happen to those who manufacture them. No one is going to legally make heroin or meth for the consumer market so you will still have an underground distribution and manufacturing system. You will still have people competing for territory and money.

[GrandJediMasterYoda]

Drugs are already legalized for Congress, they don’t have to p*ss in that freakin’ cup, and look at the results: We are one election away from the end of this country. Tulsi needs a shrink.

[JudyinCanada]

Let’s make murder legal, then we’re dealing with anger management rather than a criminal offense.

[HighSierra5]

She’s just trying to get attention. Won’t work.

[stars & stripes forever]

[stars & stripes forever]

TULSI GABBARD is shown to have poor voting attendance records in Congress. GABBARD has missed nearly a quarter of the votes in the House of Representatives this year. She's a flaming liberal.

Tulsi Gabbard's Voting Records

[dynachrome]

Dump fentanyl in large piles at all “homeless” camps.

[McGruff]

But she’s so hot in her surfing outfit?

[Bommer]

So the opioids epidemic is occurring because of legally prescribed drugs. Now she thinks if the flood gates are opened, things will get better? How does this idiot even get elected? Or better yet, was there some sort of Stanic soul sell of the DNC to rush in the end times? I guess they weren’t told that they eventually lose in the end and spend eternity burning in a lake of fire?

[youngidiot]

This b*tch

[cyclotic]

What a stupid answer. You can treat the junkie as a victim while drugs are illegal.

Our conservative Shariff does just that. They want to help the user and work with them to help them get clean, as long as they help build the case against the dealers.

Those they go after with a vengeance. It seems to be bearing some fruit. Overdose deaths were down 30% last year.

Legalizing them will only increase deaths and abuse.

[notaliberal]

I wonder if Tucker will have her on his program to talk about this!

[shanover]

She is a pandering fidiot. She says sh*t without any care of the actual consequences.

[EinNYC]

Um, no. If you need to be drugged to get through your day, you are pathetic. We don’t need your impaired judgment on the roads, in the office, or in the voting booth. Tulsi wants to eliminate the stigma. No, darlin’. There SHOULD be a stigma. It’s not normal to let the populace turn themselves into a bunch of tractable zombies. But that is precisely what the dummocraps would LIKE.

[McGruff]

The stance also puts her a step further than former South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg, a rival Democratic presidential candidate, who has endorsed simply decriminalizing possession of all drugs.

Entrepreneur Andrew Yang, another contender, supports decriminalizing opioids and funding safe consumption sites for illegal drugs. He also wants to make psychedelic mushrooms “more freely available.”

[9YearLurker]

How does legalization spare people addiction?

She’s just a CIA mouthpiece.

[TChad]

If legal is good, then legal and FREE would be even better!

Free at last!