Thanks for the historical detail.
It is said and I believe that the so-called ‘deep state’ had backed a plan for Soleimani to attack American and its allies at various points to instigate and provoke a war with the United States. President Trump confirmed there were plans afoot to attack several American targets, that the strike against Soleimani was to stop these planned attacks.
It was said further that a war with Iran was planned/backed by global interests including US deep-state actors as a means to take control of the narrative and deflect Trump’s imminent crack down on widespread corruption and crimes committed or supported by deep-state interests.
I believe a war involving the US would be of benefit to Democrats in DC and I believe they would conspire in secret to see such wars started.
Now here are some related the questions:
Having failed to start wars in NK and Iran, is it plausible the next attempt will be to support a civil war on US soil?
Wold such an armed confrontation on US soil benefit Democrats?
Speaker Pelosi Threatens Possibility of Armed Conflict Against U.S. Department of Justice…
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/01/03/speaker-pelosi-threatens-possibility-of-armed-conflict-against-u-s-department-of-justice/
I would consider a few questions before settling on a CWII:
1. The divide would be along what lines?
2 Civil Wars are entered into with both sides convinced they will win. Does that exists between the factions described in #1, above?
3. Wars always benefit three parties. What are the benefits to each faction above in the event of a win? What is the benefit to the 3rd (influence)party if EITHER factions wins? (This will tell you who 3P will eventually root for.)
Each time I see divisions or some call to “Havoc!”, these questions always tell me that their will be no CWII.
We are a pragmatic lot,