(My paraphrasing) The good thing is that while the House Lawyer is arguing that it is unprecedented and monsterous that the DOJ is opposing the release of Mueller Grand Jury Testamony, Judge Rao responds that she can find no previous case where this happened, so, no, NOT unprecedented as he sayes. “Can you find such a case?” She asks “ I would be happy to see it!”
He admitted he would have to look.
Not certain where this will go.
Lawyer said the houser could send the Sgt at Arms to seize requested info from DOJ, which he assumed they would submit to. If not then it might turn into a gun battle,etc.
(I suspect doj would just say we aren’t telling you where it is. So there. Good luck finding it, and Sgt at arms would have to just go away.)
>>the House Lawyer is arguing that it is unprecedented and monsterous that the DOJ is opposing the release of Mueller Grand Jury Testamony
I’ve never imagined the Democrats taking their lack of respect for our constitution to the point where they treat it as convenient to use when it backs them up, but able to be ignored whenever it goes against what they want to do. And the idea that they could drag 1/2 of the country into such a flipping off of our fundamental document still just can’t seem to filter through my calcified brain. Is this Republic so close to complete dissolution?