[HandyDandy]

mr k, earlier you had stated that President Lincoln held onto his “colonization” idea till “his dying days” (your words). That is totally incorrect. Please learn more about that before you open your mouth about it again. By the time of “his dying days” (your words), Abe had given up on the idea.

You also mentioned that Abe was “executed”. Please correct that.

In addition, getting back to Lincoln and Taney, are you familiar with who authored the following passage?:

“Whatever may be the force of the decision of the Supreme Court in binding the parties and settling their rights in the particular case before them, I am not prepared to admit that a construction given to the constitution by the Supreme Court in deciding any one or more cases fixes of itself irrevokably [sic] and permanently its construction in that particular and binds the states and the Legislative and executive branches of the General government, forever afterwards to conform to it and adopt it in every other case as the true reading of the instrument although all of them may unite in believing it erroneous.”

[Kalamata]

>>HandyDandy wrote: "[E]arlier you had stated that President Lincoln held onto his “colonization” idea till “his dying days” (your words). That is totally incorrect. Please learn more about that before you open your mouth about it again. By the time of “his dying days” (your words), Abe had given up on the idea."

No, I am correct; and since have opened your mouth, put your money where your mouth is.

*****************

>>HandyDandy wrote: "You also mentioned that Abe was “executed”. Please correct that."

You are asking me to lie. No thanks. There were executioners lined up from Washington D.C. to Texas "dying" to rid the world of that terrorist.

*****************

>>HandyDandy wrote: "In addition, getting back to Lincoln and Taney, are you familiar with who authored the following passage?:

"Whatever may be the force of the decision of the Supreme Court in binding the parties and settling their rights in the particular case before them, I am not prepared to admit that a construction given to the constitution by the Supreme Court in deciding any one or more cases fixes of itself irrevokably [sic] and permanently its construction in that particular and binds the states and the Legislative and executive branches of the General government, forever afterwards to conform to it and adopt it in every other case as the true reading of the instrument although all of them may unite in believing it erroneous.”

That sounds like something a true Constitutional scholar would say. It is certainly Jeffersonian, as well as anti-Marshallian.

Mr. Kalamata