Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg
We're discussing the Southern rebellion. You can't deal with the actions of one leader without taking into account the actions of the other.

Your claim would have Lincoln as Davis' puppet. I think he was not. I think Davis was his.

663 posted on 01/14/2020 6:38:55 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no oither sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 653 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp; DoodleDawg
DiogenesLamp to Doodledawg: "Your claim would have Lincoln as Davis' puppet. I think he was not. I think Davis was his."

This claim conforms to the old explanation that clever Lincoln somehow "tricked" simple Davis into starting war at Fort Sumter.
One problem with it is that Davis himself never admitted such a thing, and indeed his own words long before Fort Sumter tell us he intended to start war at both Forts Sumter and Pickens.

Another is that by very far, Davis was the more highly trained and experienced political & military leader, a West Pointer, war veteran with decades of political experience by contrast with whom Lincoln was a simple & poor country bumpkin.

I think it's unfair to call either the other's "puppet".

1,355 posted on 02/03/2020 12:26:16 PM PST by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 663 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson