[Kalamata]

>>DoodleDawg wrote: “I wrote it, not BroJoeK,”

I see that now. My apologies.

******************
>>DoodleDawg wrote: “and as a YEC the idea that you trust any of them is ridiculous.”

I trust all scientific data, either to confirm or dismiss. That is the way science works. Perhaps you have confused science with consensus and/or great story-telling. Bad move.

Mr. Kalamata

[BroJoeK]

Kalamata: "I trust all scientific data, either to confirm or dismiss.
That is the way science works.
Perhaps you have confused science with consensus and/or great story-telling.
Bad move."

Naw, the truth is that Kalamata "trusts" no fact or scientific idea which conflicts with his own Biblical interpretations, none, period.
So, if you press him on certain scientific observations, say for example, the decay rate of Uranium 235, he will announce that it can't be proved and means nothing in any case.

If you ask him about, say, the red shift in light from stars measured to be millions of lightyears away, he'll tell you it can't be proved, it's not important, means nothing and certainly shouldn't be used to support atheistic "just so stories".