Q Anon: 12/16/19 Trust Trump’s Plan ~ Vol.199, Q Day 780

qmap.pub ^ | 12/16/19 | FReepers, vanity

[grey_whiskers]

[Steven W.]

That is SWEET

[CJ Wolf]

When geotus mentions the sanctuary cities, I wish he would mention the counties In Virginia who are with him. Sweet dreams. America got this.

[Right-wing Librarian]

>> President Trump was never given due process by being able to defend himself in the House. This part is going to be interesting.
*****************************************************
I think so too, CG. It’s new territory, so to speak.

[Pelham]

Merriam-Webster agrees with what I said:

“Testimonial evidence indicates that references to (and calls for) “impeaching” a public official are commonly understood to refer not simply to charging that official with misconduct “before a competent tribunal,” but to actually removing the official from office. “

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/impeach#usage-1

[RitaOK]

Trump will contest this Impeachment on the merits and Process.

I expect him to move this to the US Supreme Court.

This Wrecks the Democrats, but must be done, to save the democracy of the Republic and its free elections.

[Unrepentant VN Vet]

.

[mairdie]

>>Hawaiian Judge rules House impeachment must be accepted without Senate trial

https://www.pbs.org/video/news-wrap-judge-rules-house-impeachment-inquiry-is-legal-1572043685/

Judge rules House impeachment inquiry is legal

FTA:
House impeachment inquiry is legal and ordered the Department of Justice to share secret grand jury testimony from the Mueller report with House investigators.

**************

https://www.hawaiipublicradio.org/post/federal-judge-rules-mcgahn-must-testify-delivering-blow-white-house

In Blow To White House, Federal Judge Rules That Don McGahn Must Testify

[dfwgator]

This Impeachment may turn out to be a blessing that give us a chance to change the direction of this country.

[little jeremiah]

Hawaiian Judge rules House impeachment must be accepted without Senate trial
—————

That seems like the Supreme Court might be required...awesome!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

All teed up.

So the Hwi’n judge thinks the Constitution is toilet paper. SPIT

[bitt]

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3801980/posts?page=1

Here’s How Much the Formal Impeachment Inquiry Has Cost Taxpayers So Far
Daily Signal ^ | 12/18/2019 | Fred Lucas

[little jeremiah]

If any links turn up to the Barr interview can you ping me?

[Right-wing Librarian]

>>t @Snowden ... I didn’t really catch it but they had video of @Snowden and said his name ... TBD ;)
********************************************************
and we remember Q said homecoming Snowden in 2020 ; )

[bitt]

Hubris – Nancy Pelosi Declares: “the senate rules are unfair” – “when rules become fair we will send articles”…
CONSERVATIVE TREEHOUSE ^ | 12/18/2019 | SUNDANCE

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3801983/posts?page=1

[Right-wing Librarian]

Well then, that’s good enough for me! Thanks, Pelham.

[blu]

This is the part where we stock up on stuff that we may have lost in tragic boating accidents, right?

[smileyface]

nite

[bitt]

WATCH: Shouting match on House floor after Nadler accused Louie Gohmert of spewing ‘Russian propoganda’
Washington Examiner ^ | Dec. 18, 2019 | John Gage

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3801932/posts?page=1

[kallisti]

I saved that pic because I want to remember it.

DC in the summer of 1974 wasn’t any different.

[SERKIT]

So Nancy holds back the Articles of Impeachment until she is assured of no corruption in the Senate. (Now she knows how Trump felt about giving aid to Ukraine before assurances were made about corruption.) But, what if the Senate wants to see the Articles of Impeachment from the House before writing the procedures and rules that Nancy so desperately wants to see? Sounds like a classic stand-off. Nancy is therefore guilty of “Obstruction of Senate” which is a crime I just made up out of whole cloth just like the 2nd Article of Impeachment.