So in sum there is nothing— no citations— you have to share to back the supposition that MOS means MOSSAD.
You and certain others here are asking me to believe an unfounded supposition, because you believe it and repeat it over and over again.
Is that as weak of an argument as it gets?
Nobody's asking you to believe anything.
You believe what you want.
You believe MOSSAD is clean as a whistle and woudtn't never do nothing wrong.
Its really obvious from your questions that you dont have a clue about anything. Q said there are no coincidences, which you should have known if you had been paying attention for the last two years. Research for yourself! No one here is going to spoon-feed you. And by the way, your long-winded statements do not make you appear educated. On the contrary, you cant seem to make a meaningful statement without a bunch of mumbo-jumbo professorial gobbledygook. You are full of malarkey! Begone, troll!
Can you read?
I didn't say anything about MOS being Mossad
I merely explained why Q was cryptic.
You want citations?...
29 Jul 2018 - 1:28:56 PM
Every C_A/MOS tactic of infiltration and internal disruption is being deployed on this board (central hub). The World is Here.
Recognize.
This movement is bigger than anyone can possibly imagine.
Peace through strength.
Q
5 Sep 2018 - 12:39:27 PM
Ask yourself a (simple) logical question
Why are the majority of 'Q' attacks by "PRO_MAGA" supporters coming from AJ [MOS backed] and/or AJ known associates?
Why are we a threat to them?
Why not simply publish an original picture +/- 1,2,3 secs to establish credibility?
Why was this done in the past?
We knew this type of "attack" was coming.
PREDICTABLE.
FAKE NEWS.
ATTACKS WILL ONLY INTENSIFY.
Q
14 Aug 2018 - 6:46:46 PM
(MOS)
/ \
(Alt + US Media) (US Politicians)
/ \
( ..)( .)
Those who scream the loudest .
Find the connections.
1:1:1:1
Primary>>AffiliateA>>AffiliateB>>AffiliateC>>
Marching to the same beat?
Coincidence?
Logical thinking.
Q
Those are Q posts. In the context of those posts MOS can only be Mossad.