Replies

i will try to type really slowly, for the comprehension challenged.

Thanks for deigning to speak very slowly for us dumb cultists.

We get that, goodman. Calling the ongoing MKULTRA program by that name is a form of shorthand to make conversation easier. Like talking about Q as if he's just some guy at a keyboard. It's also us acknowledging that we understand the CIA lied when they said they aborted the program (your Jason Bourne analogy).

We cultists do actually get your point, but it's just a semantical game you're playing.

You do know that, right?

Harking back to your earlier bromide. What about Q posting the pic of Schiff's kid wearing the MOSSAD shirt was a 'coincidence'? The fact that he was wearing a MOSSAD shirt? That he was Schiff's kid wearing a MOSSAD shirt? Or the fact that Q posted it when he posted that MOS influenced American media?

Let's identify the 'coincidence'. The cult demands it.

Let’s presume for a moment that you are correct in what you seem to insist is more than a coincidence or a political double entendre. Your contention (pardon me for attempting to restate and sorry if i am getting it wrong) that Schiff’s son wore the MOSSAD t-shirt as a hiding-in-plain-sight style sign of allegiance to the deep state, that Q flagged it and used it to suggest, without any further apparent support, that MOSSAD controls the deep state narrative via the MSM, and that this defeats conjecture in the spirit of Ockam’s Razor that MOS stands for Media Object Server — a system which is in actual use today by the MSM back in reality-land.

(Do I have your contention correctly?)

Let’s check consistency with the real world. Does anything else that we know for a fact suggest that MOSSAD controls or helps control the deep state narrative? If it does, why is the MSM so uniformly anti-Israel / pro-Muslim?

Can you give any more logical support as to why your conjecture should be preferred over mine? Otherwise it does not seem to pass the giggle test.

> Hold me.

For a guy who claims that speech is his weapon, you seem rather thin skinned. Let’s call the whole thing off.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOILZ_D3aRg

I lean towards the SteveH interpretation of MOS at the pinnacle of the media org.

In part this is because I have long been very interested in the methods of control of organizations and ultimately society at large through control of the information technology infrastructure, and SteveH’s theory fits right in with this point of view.

Besides, it is simply too simplistic for me to see MOS and C_A as identical, and the excessive CIA influence is extremely obvious as indicated by the suppression of JFK questioning and several other ABSOLUTE TABOO “conspiracies” within the MSM.

Sorry ... I’ve lost track of whether this position makes me a reality denier or a victim of conspiracy-cult-think. Maybe both.