[SteveH]

Let’s presume for a moment that you are correct in what you seem to insist is more than a coincidence or a political double entendre. Your contention (pardon me for attempting to restate and sorry if i am getting it wrong) that Schiff’s son wore the MOSSAD t-shirt as a hiding-in-plain-sight style sign of allegiance to the deep state, that Q flagged it and used it to suggest, without any further apparent support, that MOSSAD controls the deep state narrative via the MSM, and that this defeats conjecture in the spirit of Ockam’s Razor that MOS stands for Media Object Server — a system which is in actual use today by the MSM back in reality-land.

(Do I have your contention correctly?)

Let’s check consistency with the real world. Does anything else that we know for a fact suggest that MOSSAD controls or helps control the deep state narrative? If it does, why is the MSM so uniformly anti-Israel / pro-Muslim?

Can you give any more logical support as to why your conjecture should be preferred over mine? Otherwise it does not seem to pass the giggle test.

> Hold me.

For a guy who claims that speech is his weapon, you seem rather thin skinned. Let’s call the whole thing off.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOILZ_D3aRg

[norsky]

For a guy who claims that speech is his weapon, you seem rather thin skinned. Let’s call the whole thing off.

you got that right
flame war meister

[bagster]

Q has pointed to MOSSAD on more than one occasion, this is just his latest.

His posting the Schiff kid pic is his messaging that Schiff is associated in some way with MOSSAD. That's my 'contention'.

Let’s check consistency with the real world. Does anything else that we know for a fact suggest that MOSSAD controls or helps control the deep state narrative? If it does, why is the MSM so uniformly anti-Israel / pro-Muslim?

And here's what I think about that.

Within each nation-state, in this case America and Israel, there are two factions struggling for control. Some of the battles are already lost, some won, and some are ongoing.

In America, it's derp state vs real Americans. In Israel, it's derp state vs real Israelis. Let's call it derp v patriot for brevity's sake.

Many countries are under the derp umbrella already. Trump has helped to free some (Saudi, Italy, Brazil, etc), yet the derps persist (i.e. Saudi). Brexit is another battlefield.

The MSM (derp media) is against Israel because they see REAL Israel as their enemy. Because they are. The middle east was almost under total derp control under Obama (caliphate) but Trump and the good guys F'd that one up too (i.e. Egypt, Saudi, Jordan, and misc. smaller states).

Israel is now working with Saudi and other former enemies against the derp coalition (Iran, etc). The derps work hard to fire up the raggedys against Israel to prevent exactly what is taking place now.

The derp faction within Israel and MOSSAD is working against Israel just like our derps are working against America. Trump and Netanyahu represent real America and Israel.

Witness the all out assault on Netanyahu and Trump.

This stuff is really simple to understand if you accept certain basic realities.

Is your MOS a thing? Sure. But its just a thing, and its not what Q was referring to in this case. What's important is WHO is running it and other programs like it and to what purpose.

Derps are real and this is war.

#SaveIsrael

#NationalismVersusDerpism

#FreedomVersusSlavery

For a guy who claims that speech is his weapon, you seem rather thin skinned.

Yea, but do I really?

#ImmuneToDimestorePsychology

[Keflavik76]

Let’s check consistency with the real world. Does anything else that we know for a fact suggest that MOSSAD controls or helps control the deep state narrative? If it does, why is the MSM so uniformly anti-Israel / pro-Muslim?
--------------------------------------------------
You have some good points but there is something else to consider. Why is the MOSSAD (Deep State) so desperate to get rid of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu? Israel has done nothing but prosper under Netanyahu so logically one can surmise that MOSSAD is anti-Israel.

[Bob Ireland]

In my earlier post, in which I meant to ping you, SteveH, I ran in to technical difficulties and a time limit.

To complete my thought, the early engagement of journalist 'stringers' and spies evolved in to a somewhat natural marriage. As HUMINT declined in importance in Langley the marriage strengthened. It is broadly recognized now that news orgs depend on 'informed sources' in remote locations of the world; the days of 'stringers' is over... too tenuous and too expensive. Besides, the check usually didn't arrive until about 9 months later. You gotta pay your bar tab in Rawal Pindi.

So the point is, this relationship has always been somewhat of a natural. Yes, there have been times when the news desk was at loggerheads with the spooks; but that didn't really apply in the field. Now the news desks are owned by the same people who were reliable sources in the past - or closely connected to them.

The marriage pact became more natural. Common outcomes were identified - and there was $$$ and to spare. Thus we find journalists (Maggie Haberman?) using tradecraft to cover essentially clandestine activities. The marriage deepens as it becomes more lucrative.

Was truth ever much of a factor?