Q Anon: 12/06/19 Trust Trump’s Plan ~ Vol.196, Q Day 770

qmap.pub ^ | 12/6/19 | FReepers, vanity

[SteveH]

you people have apparently moved beyond your own lexicon, which does not support your claims. so yes, humpty dumpty is apt for you people.

[bitt]

me too...I looked for that tweet and did not find it..

[nanetteclaret]

Yes, it helps. But my point is that it has never been proved that the body that was examined was actually that of JE. There was a lot of discussion right after it happened about the body being wheeled on the guerney not looking like JE, and therefore, who was it?

[grey_whiskers]

I admit to being a retired I also explained why I came back again recently.

I missed that post of yours.

Just curious, was it the bug-zapper thread?

(Irony with Guiliani now being involved in the Ukraine revelations as a good guy).

[bitt]

“non-q posters off the q threads. Thanks for trying to appreciate my concerns and for humoring me on this.

279 posted on 12/27/2018, 6:20:13 PM by Jim Robinson’”

[olesigh]

I have followed the expectations of justice since the campaign.

If you want optimism, I’m not that guy. Celebrate the WINS jobs, the wall, etc. I will be seen posting acknowledge of what is going right.

But I try to be reasoned and have some facts behind my posts when pointing out the problems. The rule of law is major failure IMO And the clock is ticking.

I don’t know if i will Q often. bit I welcome disagreement and reasoned explanations.

I will attack in defense of [personal shots as i did little last night with the gatekeeper.

I will stay and debate any respectful poster.

Now enough about me. Out.

[grey_whiskers]

I don’t think it was.
But I didn’t see the original.

[olesigh]

not a post my account bio

[RitaOK]

Agreed, I done see that one comment anywhere at all. I hit the side way arrow that took me to today tweets I guess, but not well dated at the top tweets.

[bitt]

“Interesting - the Dem counsel/witness is allowed to be asked questions but the GOP counsel has been excused and cannot take questions”

~~~

ooops, sorry, I was mistaken.. Steve Castor has been presenting for a while now, after the break.

[RitaOK]

How’d you like my Ricky Ricardo imitation, there?

[bagster]

you people do not even have a common lexicon that you all can agree on. i inadvertently uncovered that

Pay heed, you cult people.

The following are some of the early warning signs of what happens when a troll's head explodes.

Common signs:

Failure to paragraph.
Failure to punctuate.
Repeats talking points over and over.
Thinks anybody cares.
Smells of boiled cabbage, farts, and urine.
Fails to understand that nobody likes him and that this is a popularity contest.
Stays angry for over 12 hours.
Puts a smiley face at the end of every post when everybody knows he frothing and crying.

These are just some of the signs. If you observe any of these signs from a troll, stand back. You don't want to get any on you. And keep all sharp objects away from the troll.

Be safe.

[bitt]

++++!

[M. Thatcher]

I lurked for a few months

Same here.

[Chuckster]

Read my bio. I signed up Aug 8, 1998

You can put anything you want in your bio.

However, you have no established credibility here. Your sign up date is 11-24-2019 Noob

[bagster]

And...out comes the logorrhea.

What's logorrhea, precious?

[Lurkina.n.Learnin]

It’s diarrhea of the mouth.

[grey_whiskers]

Man, you’re quick at responding. Thanks for the assist, partner!

[SteveH]

i’ve been called a lot of things on and off over the years on FR, but being called a troll is relatively new. I think it is because my FR membership predated the troll phenomenon. So although you are technically correct you are commenting on my behavior, the troll accusation traditionally carries an implied connotation of signing up on a bb for the specific purpose of political subterfuge. That is not the case with me, and in fact you are more vulnerable to that accusation by way of your later sign up date than i am.

as far as capitalization goes, i am no grammar not-see. but your criticism is form over substance, which is to say, relatively content free. i get my points across well enough for you people to understand. As far as my use of “you people,” again it is form over substance. It obviously triggers you. Perhaps you should ask yourself why you are so triggered about form over substance issues while avoiding discussion of the substantive issues I have raised.

[SteveH]

?