The child advocate that interview both children for the court was the one who said they belonged with their father in TN. Judge just went along with her opinion. Mother claimed father bribed and otherwise influenced the children. Advocate said absolutely not. Giving children breakfast and getting them to school on time was not bribery. She was adamant that the children were “not ready to be in mothers care again”. And advised court that they should only be in her presence with supervision.
Mother claims she has an “expert witness” that said otherwise. But that witness never appeared in court. It is why she is appealing. That she didn’t get a chance to have her witnesses heard.
Sounds like The Advocate had it right! Too bad the judge changed her mind. Well I hope the mother’s Witnesses keep not showing up, it’ll be a slam dunk.
I don’t get why someone who won’t keep proper care of the kids even wants them. Maybe for the child support.