I was just going to ask if they have allowed the children’s input on this, either through a therapist or directly. Sounds like it’s going that route.
The child advocate that interview both children for the court was the one who said they belonged with their father in TN. Judge just went along with her opinion. Mother claimed father bribed and otherwise influenced the children. Advocate said absolutely not. Giving children breakfast and getting them to school on time was not bribery. She was adamant that the children were “not ready to be in mothers care again”. And advised court that they should only be in her presence with supervision.
Mother claims she has an “expert witness” that said otherwise. But that witness never appeared in court. It is why she is appealing. That she didn’t get a chance to have her witnesses heard.