The original plan for the Indian union included what is now Pakistan and Bangladesh; the most prominent of the muzzie leaders in India led a separatist movement which resulted in two countries. After a few short wars in which India beat Pakistan each time, so-called E Pakistan threw off the foreign rule and became Bangladesh. India’s own population is north of a billion, of which about 150 million are muzzie — and that’s a substantial fraction of the entire world muzzie population.
I vaguely remember a college history class with the instructor discussing the Partition. There was one comment that stuck with me. He said...in order to reach their new “homeland”, the Muslims were traveling on one direction, the Hindus in the opposite direction...often on the same road....and killing each other along the way.
Good summarization, SC
There are a lot of queer things hidden in those statements
1. the most prominent Muslim leader who led the partition, who wanted a ‘homeland for Muslims’ and who was the first leader of Pakistan - Mohammad Ali Jinnah. He was a pork-eating, smoking, drinking non-believer.
Jinnah married a Zoroastrian (Parsi) woman and there is no indication the believed in Islam at all. He wanted a state that gave its minorities freedom (brilliant plan....)
2. The Bengalis were mistreated by West Pakistanis - putting the lie that religion alone can be a common factor
3. Pakistan no longer has a raison d’etre. It was planned as a home for the subcontinent’s Muslims - but 50% elected to stay back. Then the Bengalis broke away (after the West Paki muslims committed genocide there) and now what is Pakistan? it’s not the land of the subcontinent’s muslims. It is nothing