Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dsrtsage
Questioning whether the British or South African taxpayer would fund their security, she added that showing 'favouritism' to one Commonwealth nation would not be fulfilling their 'responsibility' to the Queen.

Read between the lines. If they do this, they will be living amongst the masses of a country full of racial strife with lots of fame and visibility but, alas, no security. They would instantly shoot to the top of every "next celebrity to die" predictions list.

The message has been sent; they will not do this.

51 posted on 10/22/2019 12:29:56 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: pepsi_junkie
Qualifications of the so-called "royal expert" that this article is based on. From her own website:

"CNN Royal Commentator Victoria Arbiter has spent a lifetime in close proximity to the British Royal Family. Her extensive knowledge and objectivity offers a unique perspective based purely on fact and insider knowledge. Upon the engagement of Prince William to Catherine Middleton, CBS News invited Victoria to return to her native London to serve as Special Royal Correspondent for the couple’s 2011 wedding. Following her three months of comprehensive coverage leading up to the event, Victoria sat alongside Erica Hill outside Buckingham Palace as a part of Katie Couric’s live, day-long broadcast of the Royal Wedding.

Am I the only one who thinks that spending a day outside of a palace with Katie Couric doesn't make you an expert of the British Constitution?

65 posted on 10/22/2019 1:32:08 PM PDT by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson