Nice work!
Another thing that has occurred to me is about all the Q references to “HUSSEIN”.
I have assumed it meant 0vomit, and in many cases I think it did. But I have never believed that 0vomit was any sort of “mastermind”. I think merely a well-compensated puppet. Since Q is fond of double meanings, perhaps some of those references to “HUSSEIN” are referring to someone else, or to someone in addition to 0vomit.
Yet another thing that I’ve been mulling over is the family connections. It seems that the Cabal stays out of the limelight. These are very, very powerful families who seem to be running the world. At the very least, they seem to have a hand in all the big companies, governments, etc. Yet, rarely are they overtly in charge.
Instead we get people like 0vomit and BJ in the White House and Trudeau in Canada. So who are these highly placed puppets?
Most of us FReeQs have seen the speculation/evidence about the 0vomit BC, and heard/read the rumors about BJ & JT. Could it be that the illegitimate children of the cabal are the ones who get the powerful jobs in the spotlight? Way too many prominent leaders have very murky pasts and birth stories.
@prayingmedic
13h13 hours ago
According to this letter, Tulsi Gabbard owes her election as a progressive in 2012 to John Podesta.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/33260
Found this.
https://aeon.co/ideas/the-strange-story-of-inventing-the-bastard-in-medieval-europe
Excerpt
...‘bastard’ because of his mixed parentage: he bore both noble and ignoble blood, ‘obliquo sanguine’..
..Yet prior to the 13th century, legitimate marriage or its absence was not the key factor in determining quality of birth. Instead, what mattered was the social status of the parents – of the mother as well as of the father. Being born to the right parents, regardless of whether they were married according to the strictures of the Church, made a child seem more worthy of inheriting parents’ lands, properties and titles.