From the story:
“The basic facts of the unusual shooting were not in dispute throughout the trial. Guyger, returning from a long shift that night, entered Jean’s fourth-floor apartment and shot him. He had been eating a bowl of ice cream before she fired.
Guyger said she parked on the wrong floor and mistook Jean’s apartment for her own, which was directly below his, and mistook him for a burglar. In the frantic 911 call played repeatedly during the trial, Guyger said “I thought it was my apartment” nearly 20 times. Her lawyers argued that the identical physical appearance of the apartment complex from floor to floor frequently led to tenants going to the wrong apartments.”
Nobody is perfect.
How many burglars would be sitting on the sofa eating a bowl of ice cream? Why was it necessary to use deadly force against a man sitting on the sofa eating a bowl of ice cream? Why does the reason she barged into the man’s apartment and shot hit make any difference? Would it make any difference for anybody else? I don’t believe it would. She murdered the man in his own home, minding his own business, enjoying a bowl of ice cream. I refuse to make excuses for her, she stupidly took the life of that man and is getting off lightly.
How frequently did it lead to other shootings?