[teppe]

Yes, I also believe that there is much that God has not told mankind about himself or what has transpired. Why throw pearls before swine? Could you conceive of God having truths that you currently are not in possession of? I suppose that your religious-bigotry would not allow you to entertain that concept.

[MHGinTN]

Calm down, teppe. You appear to have found a new word which you use as if it is armor against truth, though truth to you is indiscernible. Lorenzo Snow's little blasphemy: As we are now god once was; as god is now we shall be. Got any apparitions you would like the share with us? How about joe smith's con job of seeing God The Father Almighty and His Son Jesus appearing in the woods to joe? That one contradicts what Jesus said regarding no man has seen the Father except He who has come from the Father.

I'm sure you can cite some magic your religion ascribes to that wondrous apparitional visitation which makes god a man ascended to godhood, right?

[Elsie]

History has shown that only ONE Mormon ever paid the price for MMM; John D. Lee...

---

"I am a true believer in the gospel of Jesus Christ, I do not believe everything that is now being taught and practiced by Brigham Young.

 I do not care who hears it. It is my last word - it is so.

 I believe he is lead­ing the people astray, downward to destruction.

 But I believe in the gospel that was taught in its purity by Joseph Smith, in former days.

 I have my reasons for it.

 

"I studied to make this man's [Brigham Young] will my pleasure for thirty years.

See, now, what I have come to this day!

 

"I have been sacrificed in a cowardly, dastardly manner." (Lee enun­ciated this sentence with marked emphasis.)

 

 

Excerpted from -->  http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/mountainmeadows/leeexecution.html

[Elsie]

When all this mud that has been flung about finally dries; I can use it to fill in the low spots in my yard.

[Elsie]

Yes, I also believe that there is much that God has not told mankind about himself or what has transpired.  YES, we agree with you.

 

Why throw pearls before swine? HUH?

 

Could you conceive of God having truths that you currently are not in possession of?   YES, we all have a mind that in no way can concieve of all GOD's knowledge and wisdom.

 

I suppose that your religious-bigotry would not allow you to entertain that concept. What?

 

 

Why the sneering questions?

 

 

We non-Mormons maintain that there is NOTHING else 'needed to be revealed' that gets a person saved and into heaven than what is found in the bible.

 

You folks have a LONG way to go to prove otherwise.

 

The LDS record shows a CHANGING GOD(s) that vacilates between eternal doctrine and goverment imposed laws.

 

We gentiles (as you so wonderfully call us) find the bible RECORD of a GOD that does NOT change to be slightly more believable.

[Elsie]

Could you conceive of God having truths that you currently are not in possession of?

Like the TRINITY; perhaps??

What if it DID come along LATER; according to LDS teaching; so why attempt to retroactively dismiss it?

You accept so readily the later stuff Joe and Brig gave you; so where is your authority to REJECT what Roman councils gave you?

After all; you use the BIBLE they supplied the world...