Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Times Blames Sexism for Failure of Gillibrand, 'Long a Champion of Women'
mrcNEWSBUSTERS ^ | SEPT. 2, 2019 | Clay Waters

Posted on 09/03/2019 3:28:00 AM PDT by Morgana

The front of Monday’s New York Times featured reporter Lisa Lerer on failed feminist Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, who tacked hard to the left on immigration and gun control in a failed attempt to appeal to today’s Democratic Party: “Gillibrand’s Failed Run Shows Feminism’s Promise and Limits.” She dropped out of the race last week.

Lerer lamented:

We just need more women.

Through Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin, Carly Fiorina and Michele Bachmann, that’s the argument that strategists, political scientists and pollsters focusing on female candidates make about the race for the White House.

More women means less attention on pantsuits and more on political strategy. More women means a candidate is judged on her merits, not as a human proxy for more than 50 percent of the population. More women makes it easier for every woman running.

In the 2020 presidential primary, six women mounted campaigns and the field finally had more than enough women to assemble a basketball team -- or to minimize the use of sports metaphors in politics, if they so chose. But the first to drop out? Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, who attempted to distinguish her candidacy by offering the most outspokenly feminist message of the field.

....

But her fiercely feminist message, according to those who study women in politics, offered a powerful test case of the different ways women can run for president, and of the obstacles they continue to face -- even in a field crowded with female contenders.

Lerer didn’t get into how Gillibrand herself made some mistakes until the middle. Even then, there were excuses aplenty, including, of course, “sexism.”

While the other women in the race, like Ms. Klobuchar and Ms. Warren, overcame early attacks on their character, some suggest Ms. Gillibrand struggled to push back against charges that she is too politically calculating -- a reputation that tends to be deployed more negatively toward female politicians than their male colleagues.

“She’s always been politically astute,” said Kelly Dittmar, a Rutgers University professor who studies female candidates. “One of the criticisms that I think is in fact imbued with sexism is that she’s too ambitious and too calculating.”

On one issue, Ms. Gillibrand did stand out -- to her detriment: Al Franken. Ms. Gillibrand faced persistent questions about her position on her former Senate colleague, who retired in 2017 following allegations of sexual harassment. While Ms. Warren and Ms. Harris also called for Mr. Franken to step down -- a fact often mentioned by Ms. Gillibrand’s frustrated aides -- Ms. Gillibrand moved first, awarding herself the credit, and the blame, for the caucus-wide call.

....

That Mr. Franken appeared to be a factor in Ms. Gillibrand’s campaign shows how female candidates can still face serious backlash for attacking high-profile men.

Lerer previously co-wrote a fawning Gillibrand profile in May 2019 under the pseudo-clever headline: “Women Who Won Are Asked if They Can Win.” The text box on the jump page: “The misogyny Clinton faced in 2016 resurfaces for 2020." The story skipped Gillibrand’s awful polling showing less than 1% favored her candidacy. Her numbers failed to rise in the interim.

It was a quite different scenario 21 months ago, when the paper launched Gillibrand's 2020 campaign on the front of the Sunday National section, under the incredibly sycophantic headline “Senator’s Star Shines as Nation Unites Behind Her Cause -- Gillibrand, Long a Champion of Women, Stays Out Front in a Cultural Reckoning.” At the time, part of her imagined appeal at the paper was being “the first in her caucus to say Senator Al Franken of Minnesota should resign” after multiple credible accounts of inappropriate behavior toward women.

The paper quickly cooled on condemning Franken (conveniently right along with the Democratic Party at large) but at the time the paper ran front-page stories installing the Democrats on the moral high ground while worrying they were just too tough on themselves, unlike those Republicans.

Ironically, back in 2009, the Times thought Gillibrand was too conservative to represent diverse New York State, when the then-one-term representative was picked to replace Hillary Clinton in the U.S. Senate after Clinton resigned to become Secretary of State in the Obama administration, back when Gillibrand actually stood against amnesty for illegal immigrants and supported gun rights.

The takeaway: At the Times, it’s fine to criticize a woman in politics that you suspect may lean conservative, but it’s sexist to criticize one that’s feminist.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: 2020election; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; election2020; kirstengillibrand; mediawingofthednc; newyork; newyorkcity; newyorkslimes; newyorktimes; partisanmediashills; presstitutes; smearmachine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: Morgana

Guess that explains why all of the other women have dropped out too. /s


41 posted on 09/03/2019 7:28:18 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief; All

Great post in a great thread. BUMP!


42 posted on 09/03/2019 7:36:02 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I agree. The Dems are a very sexist organization.


43 posted on 09/03/2019 8:01:35 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mom.mom

Why is Warren leading? Isn’t she a woman?


I don’t think we are supposed to ask such a question. It’s a good one, based on their saying a woman candidate failed due to sexism, then how do they explain another woman being in the top tier now?

And if Cory Booker and Kamala Harris fail, it will be due to racism, even though we’ve already had a non-white president. Pete Buttgig, if he fails, will be said to be due to “homophobia”.

They have their templates set up. They just need to fill in the blanks when the time comes, hit “send”, and publish the story at the appropriate time.


44 posted on 09/03/2019 8:08:23 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I would love to see the next president ,after Trump,as a woman in the ideological mold of a Trump.


45 posted on 09/03/2019 8:59:42 AM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shanover

I thought we were on that path with Sarah Palin. But her ongoing domestic implosions have likely rendered that moot (i.e. her kids can’t keep themselves out of the tabloids).


46 posted on 09/03/2019 9:18:20 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Ha ha ha ha ha ha....


47 posted on 09/03/2019 7:30:31 PM PDT by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

/bingo

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3776168/posts?page=23#23


48 posted on 09/04/2019 9:31:53 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: grania

A first woman President should have ability and experiences that prepare her to be Commander in Chief of the military...

That applies to anyone who wants to be president.

We already tried the experiment with a completely unqualified goof because of the color of his skin.


49 posted on 09/04/2019 9:36:29 AM PDT by Texas resident (Democrats=Enemy of People of The United States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson