To: Kalam
Generally, as I was cheating ahead I noticed your post # 249. While I read the artice you linked, I wondered if any of the missing associates might not already be in protective custody.
One can hope.
WWG1WGA
—
#249 was from blu. Was it a different post you meant? 1499? About Brunel? If so, good point. I hadn’t thought about him (or others) already being in custody. I just assumed he was in hiding. But being in custody makes just as much sense. Thanks! Interesting!
1,539 posted on
09/03/2019 8:44:28 AM PDT by
generally
( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
To: ransomnote; Steven W.; greeneyes; TEXOKIE; txhurl; saywhatagain; Swordmaker; ptsal; bagster; ...
1,544 posted on
09/03/2019 8:57:21 AM PDT by
generally
( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
To: generally
Oops, yeah it was 1499. Like I said I was cheating ahead.
1,559 posted on
09/03/2019 9:44:05 AM PDT by
Kalam
(Poor me, I have lost my tagline :())
To: generally
Oops, yeah it was 1499. Like I said I was cheating ahead.
1,560 posted on
09/03/2019 9:44:40 AM PDT by
Kalam
(Poor me, I have lost my tagline :())
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
