And one about the end of the Clinton legacy
https://amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/596323/
Did Bill Clinton See This Coming?
On his 73rd birthday, the former MVP of the Democratic Party has been sidelined—perhaps for good.
....Today, as he marks a birthday he might once have doubted he’d have, Clinton’s name means something different than it did 20 years ago, particularly among Democrats. Nearly all the two dozen 2020 candidates vying for the party’s nomination would likely hesitate to accept his open endorsement. Eleven months from now, Clinton may find himself, as Bush once did, at home on the couch, watching the national convention, asking aloud a question, the answer to which he already knows.
Excerpt
Does it look to you as if BJ is over?
Not only that, but the left are trying to distance themselves from him. I’m expecting to see more articles like this, only increasingly harsh.
Q said a while back that we should expect to see the Clinton’s “public health” deteriorate” or something like that. I assumed it meant physical health. And though I still think that, maybe it also means “political health”.
A non- blue checkmark Dr Robert Epstein tweets:
.@HillaryClinton, whom I have strongly supported for many years, told blatant lies about me today. As a result, I have been subjected to widespread condemnation by mainstream media. I’m going to fight this. Stay tuned tomorrow for my first-ever twitter storm.
https://twitter.com/DrREpstein
.........
Replies are fun!