They fired a bloody damn missile at AF1 goodman. They killed one of his SS agents trying to poison him in Scotland. You don’t hear about the attempts that fail.
FReeQs,
Apologies for my hasty post yesterday (and PM that I sent to some of you). I was short on time (AFK the rest of the day) and should have been more careful before I posted.
For the record, my position on Israel is this: Very pro-Israel as long as they are not anti-USA. IMO Israel has a DS just as we do. So they have bad actors mixed in among the good just as we do.
I have no special insight into who is a good guy and who is a bad guy, but Ehud Barack appears to be dirty based on recent Epstein info. I’m biased in favor of Netanyahu, think he’s a good guy.
Also for the record, I’m pretty sure that intel agencies worldwide are corrupted and I’m distrustful of all of them. That includes MOS. Do any of them have good people working for them? I’m assuming they all do. I’m assuming that the basic problem is that the executive levels are corrupt, that those not in the “inner circle” are being used.
As with many in our own country, it will not surprise me to be surprised (!) to find out that certain people I thought were derps were not and certain people I thought were good guys were derps.
Before Q, when faced with things that didn’t add up (especially with people I thought were conservative politicians/appointees who did things that looked questionable to me), I *ASSUMED* that it was because people who were higher up had more info than I did and that if I knew what they knew that I would understand the reason for the decisions they made and the things they did that were cognitively dissonant.
Now, in the Q era, I don’t easily give anyone a pass. I don’t expect to understand every single thing right this minute, but I DO expect everything to be explained eventually. In a reasonable amount of time. For example, saying that the truth about the JFK assassination (or any controversial event. Pick your favorite.) is too explosive for the public to know, is BS. It might be 5% damaging to the public psyche, but it’s 95% damaging to the continued control of the DS, to their reputations, to their life outside of prison, to their fortunes.
My view is that the American public could handle ANY truth about who shot JFK (or whatever) and still function. For the vast majority of people, they might be shocked to find out the truth is not the lie they’ve been fed, but it would have no direct bearing on them personally. They will still get up in the morning and go to work, raise their families, attend church/synagogue, play sports, go to movies, mow the lawn, take the kids to piano lessons, etc. The truth about JFK (etc) is not going to change that. It is a conceit of the “elite” that we couldn’t handle it, or that it would be devastating to us, or that it would be much of anything more than a small blip in our lives.
The much bigger effect on our lives will not be the truth about any particular event or “fact”. The bigger effect will be learning that we’ve been lied to about everything. Or at least about so many things. That will be a shake up. But even with that, we’ll go to work, raise families, all those things. We just won’t be so blindly trusting of “authority”.
JMO
There still may be nuggets of good information among the chaff in a couple of my recent posts, but I won’t defend them as a whole.
So thanks to all who raised issues, especially those who pointed out specific errors. Much appreciated. I’ll try to be more careful and not so hasty to post.
g
ichabod1 wrote:
“...They killed one of his SS agents trying to poison him in Scotland...”
Please post sauce on this one!
It will be much more obvious than that
even the MSM will acknowledge it
but it will strengthen Trump