Posted on 08/15/2019 9:43:43 AM PDT by ransomnote
I like it!
I accept your surrender.
#YoullLearnNotToStepToMe
It’s your fantasy keyboard warrior, knock yourself out.
she’s one of those that I look at in a catholic school boy kinda way...
Note Trump is leaning forward
Trump is heavier than Barron so sinking into the grass deeper..
Also Trump is walking forward standing on left leg
Trump is 72, when you get past 70 start to loose height due to spinal disk contraction with age.
Huge!
That’s pretty damned sick right there.... “These people are SICK!”
mark
Wow, it says that Noel Remagen go fund me page has collected..
$372,471 of $375,000 goal.
https://heavy.com/news/2018/07/nole-remagen/
ThankQ :)
thanks for pulling info together!
yikes!
have you noticed your skin becoming nice and smooth? :)
Very bad news for the Dems and the reason they have gone so full tilt “racist”
Trump is winning with urban voters and has record support with African Americans...
...Race also played a factor in Trump’s job approval rating. Hispanics, this time around, were much more likely to approve of his job performance (49% approve/51% disapprove), while the president also saw his numbers jump with African Americans. This was his second straight poll with over a quarter support from African Americans (28% approve/70% disapprove). If Trump wins half of Hispanics and a quarter of African Americans in 2020, Democrats will be in trouble!
yup
nTheMatrixxx declares this a Q proof:
Compare drop 3504 with this portion of Minecraft:
https://mobile.twitter.com/AocToes/status/1151281852319010817
I don’t know if I see this as a proof. Players create their own buildings in Minecraft. Unless there is an option now to pick it from a menu? It has been awhile since I’ve had the teenage boys playing it. But the Q post inmplies a specific game with that theme. Not sure Minecraft would qualify.
That was my impression too (not really a proof)
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/08/election_2020_its_the_crowds_stupid.html
Election 2020: It’s the Crowds, Stupid!
By Brian C. Joondeph
FTA:
The media only reluctantly reports strong economic news, being careful to not attribute any of it to President Trump. Instead they try to make the case, as NPR did, that today’s economic juggernaut is due to the last president, now over 2 ½ years out of office. Another of many examples of fake news and history revision, a staple of modern media.
Economic indicators are easy to measure but what may be equally or even more important in the 2020 election is voter enthusiasm. This is harder to quantify compared to unemployment numbers or the S&P 500 index.
One such measure is consumer confidence. Rasmussen, arguably the most accurate pollster in the 2016 election, noted this.
Thirty-nine percent (39%) of Likely U.S. Voters think the country is heading in the right direction, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey for the week ending August 8. By comparison, this number ran in the mid- to upper 20s for much of 2016, President Obama’s last full year in office.
On August 15, Rasmussen also reported, in their Daily Presidential Tracking Poll, that Trump’s total approval was at 46 percent, compared to Obama at 44 percent at the same point in their respective presidencies.
I suggest another metric to gauge voter enthusiasm, crowd size. As we are in campaign mode, all of the candidates are holding campaign rallies around the country. Trump was famous for holding massive rallies in 2016, several in one day, as election day drew near. In fact, on the day before the 2016 election, Trump held five rallies in five states, his last one running into the wee hours of election morning.
Meanwhile Mrs. Clinton was gulping chardonnay, picking out drapes for the Oval Office, and trying not to tumble to the ground in front of a camera. Her rallies, the few she held, were far less enthusiastic and much smaller in size. If one used the metric, “It’s the crowd, stupid” to predict the electoral outcome, the results would have been far more accurate than the myriad polls predicting a Clinton landslide.
...
Did Senator Elizabeth Warren really “pack a crowd” in New Hampshire? Despite the misleading banner, Drudge linked to an article with this headline, “Warren speaks to crowd of hundreds in Franconia.” She “spoke to a crowd of more than 700 voters,” according to the article.
How much more? Certainly, less than 800 or else the headline would have said she “spoke to a crowd of nearly 800 voters.” How did that crowd compare to another campaign rally in the same state on the next day?
Is Warren just another of the 20 desperate Democrats seeking the nomination? Hardly, as she is only one point behind front runner Joe Biden. Warren is not a bottom of the barrel candidate like Bill de Blasio who drew only 15 people to a recent campaign event in Iowa, with more media in his audience than voters.
This reinforces my correlation of crowd sizes and electoral popularity. Warren had 700 attendees and she’s the co-front runner. De Blasio is polling at zero percent and his “crowd” of 15 reflects as much.
Who else held a rally this week in New Hampshire? Another presidential candidate who drew over 11,000 voters to his rally, filling the auditorium to capacity. That’s 15 times the audience that Warren drew. As usual, many more showed up to see the president but couldn’t watch the rally in the actual venue, instead watching outside in the overflow space.
...
Rather than listen to the nay-sayers on cable news, use your own eyes. Look at crowd sizes and enthusiasm as a better metric than opinion polls which oversample Democrats, the same polls that predicted a Clinton landslide victory.
Despite CNN’s constant contention that “President Trump is on the ropes,” remember that “it’s the crowd, stupid.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.