Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah

954 posted on 08/09/2019 12:47:52 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 953 | View Replies ]


To: Steven W.

Do you have a link for that?

I thought the red circled part was interesting, but I was also very interested in the question right before it.

Ken Starr. So he was a derp all along? And that is why nothing came of the Lewinsky situation? (Or did everyone else know all along that KS was dirty? Somehow I missed that. I just thought he was outmaneuvered by others in high places in the goobermint.)


1,020 posted on 08/09/2019 3:58:18 PM PDT by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 954 | View Replies ]

To: Steven W.
Today's document release shows that Epstein had a predilection not only for very young women but also for brilliant scientists. The linked Slate article doesn't mention Epstein's recruiters of young women (e.g., Ghislaine Maxwell and Ray Chandler), but it makes clear that publisher John Brockman was Epstein's scientist recruiter, responsible for convening luxurious salons on Little Saint James or elsewhere.

At these salons, Epstein was always surrounded/fondled by several youngish women (not so young as to raise pedophilia concerns among the attendees). Behind the scenes, some of the scientists got to sample the jailbait.

Sad.

1,119 posted on 08/09/2019 7:26:04 PM PDT by AZLiberty (218 House seats or bust! Bust. But the Dems will be busted for election fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 954 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson