I was just thinking about the Trust (QQQ) rolling banner we saw yesterday.
Perhaps Q is reminding us to trust the people he mentioned in all those posts, like
Trust Sessions
Trust Kansas
etc.
I wonder if the number of Trust X posts by Q matches up with the number of times that Trust (QQQ) scrolled on the chyron.
I was just thinking about the Trust (QQQ) rolling banner we saw yesterday.
Perhaps Q is reminding us to trust the people he mentioned in all those posts, like
Trust Sessions
Trust Kansas
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sounds very possible.
Watched the video again. I counted 11 sets of Trust (QQQ).
That’s 33 Qs in parens and another 33 Q outside the parens. There were also a few other tickers with Qs. I saw at least 3 other Qs but wasn’t focusing on them. Maybe there is a lot more to this to be decoded.
Maybe we should also look at the top ticker and the other stocks listed.
One of the anons pointed out that the price of QQQ was 188.something and 1+8+8 = 17.
Searching for “trust” on qanon.pub gives 45 results. Not all say “trust so-and-so”. Not sure if that is 45 occurences of “trust” or 45 Q posts.
I’ve got company arriving shortly, so if anyone wants to dive in on this, that would be great.
I am not as intrigued by the Q’s on the chyron but am a little ... let me explain.
The “QQQ” is how investors track the NASDAQ. One can do similarly with SPY for S&P 500 and DIA for the DOW 30. If you are an individual investor then these are easy ways to try and mirror market performance without having to manage all of the individual holdings that those who manage the indexes (NASDAQ/S&P/DOW).
Whenever there is an after hours report by a company that jars the market, whether positively or negatively, that will inevitably impact the indices, depending on what proportion they are held, of course, and it’s nearly always the case that when a company reports or there’s some kind of after hours trading going on that impacts the indexes, particularly the NASDAQ (being more volatile), then CNBC *always* includes those in their chyron.
In this case it might appear that AMD had some news in the air from a conference call or something and the NASDAQ was thus in focus. Keep in mind that the video one sees on television is the end product composed of the main video and the chyron, etc.. It is often the case that CNBC would have the original video of an interview, such as Bannon, on their site, and not the end product with chyron that one would find on YouTube, etc..
So none of the above is surprising to me ...
BUT for POTUS to single one out with the chyron for a Tweet is certainly interesting though a lesser “proof” IMO
WWG1WGA :)