Replies

I think my mind is working overtime. I was thinking that Q might add “biased news coverage” complaints to his Top Ten and hit the US media for not lying but having a pro-bias. From my foreign service days, I know the Amb Sec and other minions at post collect information in newsprint about the people on the calendar for meetings to be better informed. To this end, I can see assigning Pol/Econ junior or first tour officers a responsibility to find US News pieces adversely affecting Trump’s message where the these American Devils pay their Due, e.g., that impartial reporting would require both sides of an issue, rather than the typical out of context pro-DNC bias/anti-RNC line. The the Amb/Public Affairs & Political/Economic Sections would send a Dip Note or similar in person protest against the media outlet. This would have the effect of curtailing CNN and other US based news from spreading half truths. Using the RT example as a first guideline under the application of this British Law: Section five: Due impartiality and due accuracy - Ofcom Search domain www.ofcom.org.uk/tv-radio-and-on-demand/broadcast-codes/broadcast-code/section-five-due-impartiality-accuracyhttps://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv-radio-and-on-demand/broadcast-codes/broadcast-code/section-five-due-impartiality-accuracy To ensure that the special impartiality requirements of the Act are complied with. Rules. Meaning of “due impartiality”: “Due” is an important qualification to the concept of impartiality. Impartiality itself means not favouring one side over another. “Due” means adequate or appropriate to the subject and nature of the programme. This article is interesting because the RT or formerly the Russian Times was not “Objective”. RT failed to preserve due impartiality in seven news and current affairs programs... there were “serious and repeated failures” in RT’s coverage. Using the available tools provided by the British Government, Trump is able to combat “Hate Speech” and other liable under British Law by protesting the airing of US hit pieces or newsprint. To date I do not think the Great Awakening has employed a stealth US attack on foreign news sources to help slay the reputation of the media abroad from home.

If you’ve seen the placeholder drops, I think Q has more in-store for the media than Just charges of bias

2489
Office of Inspector General (OIG) Report and Findings
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
12 Nov 2018 - 12:30:42 PM
[Placeholder - OIG Report & Findings]
[Placeholder - OIG report > FBI, DOJ, & Media Coll]
[Placeholder - OIG report > Exe B_ABCs & Media Coll]
[Placeholder - OIG report > Foreign ASST_D1]
[Placeholder - OIG report > Foreign_Insert(s)_ORec & Info Diss]
[Placeholder - OIG report > FISA Abuse DIR_INDIR_Source_DIS]
[Placeholder - OIG report > Umbrella SPY & Targeting]
[Placeholder - OIG report > OTR_C_]