Working on an Epstein update to capture research and news for FReeQs, FReepers, and FRens. And the Oracle.
[Smoke & Mirrors]
How do you attempt to keep the ‘narrative’ in play [control the ‘sheep’]?
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dems-launch-impeachment-investigation-with-bid-for-grand-jury-info-insist-mueller-delivered
Key sentence:
Nadler called the grand jury materials “critically important” for their investigation.
Does Nadler understand that the ‘critically important’ material requested would be illegal for AG Barr to disclose?
https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/04/mueller-report-attorney-general-grand-jury-information/
“This means Attorney General Barr must redact grand-jury material from the Mueller report before disclosing it to Congress. Democrats will complain long and loud about this, but I don’t see how Barr can be reasonably faulted for following the law. Congress, after all, has the power to legislate an amendment to Rule 6(e) that would permit disclosure of grand-jury materials from a special counsel investigation to appropriate congressional committees.”
Will members of the D party Congress attempt to amend Rule 6(e) in order to obtain grand jury material deemed ‘critically important’?
No?
Logical thinking, why?
Why paint a narrative that the one item you cannot possess is the one item you need in order to justify your argument?
People elected ‘knowingly’ spreading false-information [disinformation]?
Puppets follow orders.
Think for yourself.
Q
I’ll be watching for that.
You have mail Kitj.