from anons...
https://twitter.com/RepMarkMeadows/status/1154033160285380609
Brilliant from @Jim_Jordan. He asks why Joseph Misfud, the key DOJ witness who helped launch this garbage collusion conspiracy, lied 3 times but DIDN’T get charged—even as Mueller was charging people connected to Trump for lying.
Mueller refused to answer. Blatant conflict.
7:18 AM - 24 Jul 2019
—
Matt Gaetz grilling Mueller:
Picks up where Jordan leaves off.
Moar Q’s on Steele, can you state with confidence that Steele dossier was not part of Russia’s disinformation campaign?
[M stumbles around a lot, tries to say it was before his time]
G isn’t buying it: Did Steele make up dossier and was lying to the FBI?
M: “beyond my purview”....
G: “No it’s exactly your purview... and here’s why:”
Either Steele made this whole thing up—was lying— or Russians were lying to him. Wasn’t that exactly your purview? (paraphrase).....
Simple question: On week of June 9, who did Veselnitskaya meet with moar frequently, Trump campaign or Simpson?
M - “not within my purview”
G - “Not your purview”—all of the above. [MG is just battering Mueller.]
[Gaetz talks about—and demonstrates—the clear BIAS of M’s investigation—throws the books at people on the Trump side and totally ignores those on the other side]
—
moar from anons ....
Meantime, over in Puerto Rica, news of Governors imminent resignation, followed by cheers and now boos as they hear who replacement may be:
https://twitter.com/BryanLlenas/status/1153867996164759552
“not within my purview”
Two meanings here. He disregarded it because someone else (Hillary) did the Steele dossier.
.or.
Another prosecutor is handling that subject and he can’t reveal what is happening with it.
The correct IMHO answer is the latter.