Supposedly, the original director of the current dreck in production wanted to kill 007 off. Maybe they do and the number 007 is reassigned to an AA.
I predict that they’ll make the name “James Bond” a code name for whoever is assigned/designated 007.
If you’re going to go retard, might as well go “full retard”.
Again, I haven’t watched a Bond flick since the snooze fest with the invisible car and have no plans to change that.
I learned over the weekend that Natalie Portman will be Thor, too.
Men apparently aren’t wanted.
What is absurd, too, is that they’re refusing to cast an ATTRACTIVE woman in this role (Miss Lynch might be a talented actress for all we know, but she is unattractive to the point of even being mistaken for tranny). Had the producers cast a really ugly middle-aged actor as Bond in 1962 instead of Connery, the movie would’ve bombed. If you’re going to place a young woman in a leading role of this sort, she has got to be physically attractive and desirable.
Now, an unattractive female CAN compensate if she is funny, multi-talented and charismatic. Look at Nell Carter back on “Gimme a Break !” She was no supermodel, but she had the personal likeability, humor, humanity, sass and charisma to make a star. She stood out even in a small role in a Chevy Chase film vehicle back in 1981, “Modern Problems.” I’m just not getting that vibe at all from Ms. Lynch.
Surely there are countless Black women out there who could’ve been a better choice if they were going to go in this direction.