I was on my phone before and was busy, couldn’t really type.
I think this story is highly, highly worthy of deep coverage, but I can see some clannish, circle-jerk LETTER GROUPS are latching onto it, getting their engines tuned and running.
I think this great, dark story is going to get Clownified, then much more easily flushed down the media toilet as just so much bigfoot/out-of-body-experience/ghost/shadow people BS befitting late night talk radio.
I think the MSM very badly wants to ignore ALL of this and the type of UFO-style coverage that I can see suddenly coming out fast and thick is going to facilitate that flushing process.
I saw a GREAT graphic at link:
A mini-submarine descending from a UFO-type billionare yacht:
Such things do exist, but has there been even one scintilla of evidence for such a sub-equipped ship going there..?
And WHY do the pervvs even NEED to go ashore via SUB...?
High cool-factor, sure, but WHY..?
I don’t get it; why not simply take the standard Avon tender..? Or why not just DOCK the whole monster there on LSJ, as the drone footage shows Epstein did have exactly such a dock FOR that purpose..? Get into a tiny sub, or just WALK down a gangway, huh..?
There are tons of great, worthy angles to this story ALREADY but people are dumping H.A.A.R.P, SEAL teams, chupacabra, pain rays, and Area 51 cammo dudes into the mix, when none of that bilge is even necessary for the already deeply amazing story.
In short, the Epstein story is turning into conspiracy centerfold porn.
Up for a short rope and a big tree - he’s ruined these girls lives.
TRS
Thanks. Logic says that this island is way too much work, complexity, and effort if all anybody was looking for was the ability to pork teenage girls. Guys like Slick Clinton can do that at trailer parks in Arkansas. Logically this island has to be for something much fancier than that and that is what the twitter article describes.
Yes the simplest answer is probably the correct answer, not these james bond theories of submarines docking with superyachts to go to a 7 acre plot of land in the sea.
That said there are a lot of questions out there that need answers. Someone benefits by pushing a horrible conspiracy into twilight zone proportions.
Why would VERY high profile people (princes, presidents, etc) not want to be seen going to a place that had a reputation as "pedo island"?
Why would young children (possibly) not want to have been seen travelling to an island known locally as "pedo island"?
The questions answer themselves, dontcha think?
Exactly. Mock, exaggerate and overplay in order for people to dismiss ALL of the story. Pretty soon they’ll be saying Epstein is the victim of overzealous prosecutors.
There are some clever people engaged in hype and disinformation. We would do well to not assume every rumor is fact.