Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: stylin19a; ransomnote; Steven W.; greeneyes; TEXOKIE; txhurl; saywhatagain; Swordmaker; ptsal; ...

From 8ch:

Epstein himself DID NOT come into federal jurisdiction! His plane did. Port Authority boarded his plane and arrested him. Epstein never touched foot on US soil before the arrest.

Epstein’s plane has the warrant on it! That is why he is willing to put it up as collateral for bail along with his 77 mil NY location ( also under seizure related to Trump EO). His lawyers are forcing the jurisdiction subject while knowing he won’t get bail.

The lawyer’s filing document for bail is not about getting him bail. They are attempting to put the Judge in a box. The Judge kicked the can down the road because he doesn’t want to rule on bail. That is why he raised the 3 day rule for the defendant and sent it to another Judge to hear later.
FOLKS! We have our first Military tribunal about to happen! This case is outside the civil court system!


WHAT IF THE CRIMES OCCURRED AT 40K FT?
Piracy is an international crime consisting of illegal acts of violence, detention, or depredation committed for private ends by the crew or passengers of a private ship or aircraft in or over international waters against another ship or aircraft or persons and property on board. (Depredation is the act of plundering, robbing, or pillaging.)

In international law piracy is a crime that can be committed only on or over international waters (including the high seas, exclusive economic zone, and the contiguous zone), in international airspace, and in other places beyond the territorial jurisdiction of any nation. The same acts committed in the internal waters, territorial sea, archipelagic waters, or national airspace of a nation do not constitute piracy in international law but are, instead, crimes within the jurisdiction and sovereignty of the littoral nation.
https://fas.org/irp/world/para/pirates.htm


Any legal beagles here who can comment on this?

Accuracy? Piracy? Tribunal? Sense/Nonsense?


252 posted on 07/13/2019 9:28:47 AM PDT by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]


To: generally

hmmmm interesting article...


253 posted on 07/13/2019 9:31:10 AM PDT by HarleyLady27 ( "The Force Awakens!!!"... "Let The Force be with YOU!!!"... Making America Great Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote; Steven W.; greeneyes; TEXOKIE; txhurl; saywhatagain; Swordmaker; ptsal; bagster; ...

Found that info on [CLASS 1-99]!

IIED = intentional infliction of emotional distress

clowns/MKUltra stuff

http://projectreporter.nih.gov/reporter_SearchResults.cfm?icde=45452921

Anon says the 1-99 may actually be 99 research programs which build a way to brainwash a population. Searchable in the database at the link above.

Some titles:

Modulation of Fear Conditioning by Extended Amygdala Circuits

Prepubertal Stress, Windows of Risk & Sex Bias for Affective Disturbance.


Shortly after this was posted on 8ch, the board blew up. Related?

This may be the most dig-worthy thing I’ve ever posted.


258 posted on 07/13/2019 9:36:47 AM PDT by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt

Please read. Comments? It’s in your wheel house.


342 posted on 07/13/2019 12:48:45 PM PDT by mkmensinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]

To: generally

I think I read that Epstain arrived on a regular commercial flight, not his own plane.

This is very interesting stuff.


345 posted on 07/13/2019 12:53:55 PM PDT by little jeremiah (When we do not punish evildoers we are ripping the foundations of justice from future generations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]

To: generally

I sure hope you are right about the first of the military tribunals...
Here is a related article I just ran across too!

Guantanamo detainee trials could be broadcast online thanks to House measure.
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jul/13/house-votes-in-favor-of-broadcasting-guantanamo-ba/?fbclid=IwAR318CKlelq6WC9m09CDhA5yRHyyWSApsNUaeTAmWECmjR2-0P65m4769dI

Interesting to note the article ends saying Trump’s advisors recommend he vetos it... Is that just reverse psychology to get the Democrats to pass it?


612 posted on 07/14/2019 1:26:35 AM PDT by AzNASCARfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson