Replies

Real head nodder

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/06/how_do_you_know_you_are_no_longer_a_democrat.html

How do you know you are no longer a Democrat?

By Anna L. Stark

FTA:
You believe and respect the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The founding documents of the United States still matter and must not be set aside.

You believe the right to free speech applies to everyone, regardless of political party affiliation.
...
You believe in the Second Amendment and the right to own guns.

You believe that the United States is a sovereign nation with recognized borders; which must be respected, guarded, and protected.

You know there are only two biological sexes. Men pretending to be women and vice-versa is make-believe. There is no such thing as being born in the wrong body.
...
You are convinced that a group of like-minded conspirators; embedded at the FBI, CIA and DOJ attempted to circumvent the election of Donald Trump and are worthy of investigation and possible prosecution if it is determined crimes were committed.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/06/babble_the_debates_and_the_scotus.html

Babble: The ‘Debates’ and the SCOTUS

By Clarice Feldman

FTA:
Life is too short to spend it on phony debates when you can see the highlights in videos and read the text of the remarks. The word peddlers are each picking their claims as to who won. The more critical observers suggest that I was right not to bother.

Apparently Julian Castro thought transwomen have a right to an abortion. (Perhaps after taxpayers pay for them to have a uterus transplant):
...
AP and others falsely claimed that the segregationists whom Biden earlier asserted he’d “crossed the aisle” to work with had been Republicans and Friday corrected the record to show they were, in fact, Democrats. If the media were honest, they’d acknowledge that the Harris-Biden tussle merely highlighted what they’ve kept hidden: The Democratic party was segregationist, not the party of Lincoln.
...
In the second case, Justice John Roberts joined with the four liberal judges on the court, respecting whether the president could reinstate a citizenship question in the upcoming census. Frankly, his act looks to me like nothing other than a poke in Trump’s eye, for it defies rational analysis.