https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/06/babble_the_debates_and_the_scotus.html
Babble: The ‘Debates’ and the SCOTUS
By Clarice Feldman
FTA:
Life is too short to spend it on phony debates when you can see the highlights in videos and read the text of the remarks. The word peddlers are each picking their claims as to who won. The more critical observers suggest that I was right not to bother.
Apparently Julian Castro thought transwomen have a right to an abortion. (Perhaps after taxpayers pay for them to have a uterus transplant):
...
AP and others falsely claimed that the segregationists whom Biden earlier asserted he’d “crossed the aisle” to work with had been Republicans and Friday corrected the record to show they were, in fact, Democrats. If the media were honest, they’d acknowledge that the Harris-Biden tussle merely highlighted what they’ve kept hidden: The Democratic party was segregationist, not the party of Lincoln.
...
In the second case, Justice John Roberts joined with the four liberal judges on the court, respecting whether the president could reinstate a citizenship question in the upcoming census. Frankly, his act looks to me like nothing other than a poke in Trump’s eye, for it defies rational analysis.
Excerpt says it all
https://spectator.org/an-angry-old-white-guy-watches-the-democratic-debate/
An Angry, Old White Guy Watches the Democratic Debate
Abraham H. Miller
FTA:
As Joseph Nye Welch said to Joseph McCarthy, “…have you no sense of decency?” The whole disgusting lot of you!
I wish the Administration would state that the Supreme Court has affirmed that the Administration has the constitutional right to add the question but quibbles over the rationale. The Supreme Court has no power to affirm or disallow policy, only constitutionality, therefore the question is added.
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3760562/posts?page=1
Babble: The ‘Debates’ and the SCOTUS
By Clarice Feldman