Posted on 06/13/2019 8:15:10 AM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia
(CNN) Keanu Reeves is officially a national treasure.
Not only is he having a moment where the world has fallen in love with him all over again thanks to his movie and streaming roles, but now you can add a new accolade to the list.
Reeves has mastered the art of posing with women without being grabby.
A tweet showing Reeves posing with multiple women, including Dolly Parton, with his arm behind the women and his hand hovering over either their arms or waists has gone viral.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
“working women are tools of Satan”
Sure, that’s what I said...viewed through the miasma of a room-temperature IQ.
“in many diverse places where conditions often forced poor men and poor women just to do what they could to survive”
Yes, that’s exactly what I was talking about. And that’s why feminists flooded into the workplace in postwar America.
“Then let’s look at the most common reasons for both parents working. Cost of living. I’d say 98% of the women I’ve come across would prefer to stay home. But, it is/was financially impossible.”
What, you think it was always like that?
Postwar America, one income supported a family. Then the feminist shit goblins flim-flammed women into entering the workplace.
Now they had families with two incomes that they could tax the crap out of. That’s why women now have to work.
I was talking historically about about Africa, Asia,the prairie lands of America say about 1840-1850.
He’s not gay!
what a childish response-
[[Sure, that’s what I said.]]
actually Yes- that is what you said:
“yet even here almost everyone has bought into the Satanic notion that it’s a good thing for women to work outside the home,”
In your statement you make it clear that you believe a woman working is doing Satan’s bidding because it’s a ‘Satanic notion’ for women to work - There’s no ambiguity in what you said- You believe that women who think it’s ok to work, and do so, are doing a Satanic deed- because women working outside the home is a ‘Satanic Notion’ in your words-
Do try to respond without childish insults next time- it does nothing to bolster you unbiblical arguments-
[[The Satan part comes in when he would do what he could to disrupt family harmony, ]]
The Satan part also comes in when the woman neglects her household in favor of job- but the plain fact is a woman can do both, run a household, AND work outside the home and not be out of God’s will doing so as We’ve seen in many cases in the bible- one of which you mentioned- nowhere in the bible does God forbid women working-
Part of a woman working outside the home IS to help provide a better life for their children and family- Many times, it is necessary for women to work outside the home because income does not provide enough for a decent living in the home with just one income- and sometimes women are single and are forced to work to provide the sole income- Certainly that can not be considered Satanic- If the bible forbade women working outside the home, then single mothers would have no hope of raising their family- and the children would have to go to foster care-
The objector might respond- But she can work the fields to provide for her children- but aha- we’re talking about ‘working outside the home’ here as well- The objectors apparently think the woman must be present with children 24-7 in the home only in order to raise her family in a biblical manner- working and slaving over a hot stove, doing laundry, cleaning hte home non stop- Well women are capable of all that PLUS doing jobs outside the home to help provide a better future for their family- Just because she helps or is sole provider does not mean she is neglecting her home duties- it’s not a ‘one or none’ type issue.
Also- how about when a husband becomes disabled? Let’s say he becomes a cripple- can’t move, can’t take care of his family- What then? Some apparent think it’s a ‘Satanic Notion’ for the woman to consider going to work- because apparently ‘A Woman’s place is in the home’.
Boy, it is really tiring to face these same dimwitted arguments again.
Perhaps if you were able to distinguish between “sometimes a necessary thing” and “always a good thing” you would be worth arguing with. As it is, I can only say, I wouldn’t discuss physics with a frog; why would I discuss this with you?
wow- you’re a nasty little person - and you’re lecturing us about the bible and about women’s places in society? Your claim that women working outside the home is Satanic- because women buy into the ‘satanic notion’ is false- as pointed out several times- Lashing out with Nasty childish insults on your part aren’t winning your argument for you fella! They just show a lack of evidence to support your unbiblical claim
If you can’t respond respond without childish insults- then I feel sorry for you- All you’re proving is that you feel the need to insult others in order to feel better about yourself when people call your claims into question- Insults don’t refute facts- most people learn that pretty early in life-
and by the way- now you’re changing the goalpost because the bible doesn’t support your original blanket claim that women working outside the home is a Satanic notion that women have bought into- NOWHERE did you mention that it was ‘sometimes necessary’- You claim was, and
I quote- ““yet even here almost everyone has bought into the Satanic notion that it’s a good thing for women to work outside the home,””
Hard to have a conversation with someone when they keep moving the goalposts AFTER they find out the bible doesn’t support their original claim- so be careful about throwing around insults- As a reminder- Nasty remarks don’t bolster your claims any- they just enforce your errors, and are petty-
and by the way DSc- I’m pretty sure I’ve run into you before on FR and you were just as nasty and condescending back then as you are now- You seem to have a real problem with putting other people down- You haven’t changed one bit - That’s a pretty bitter way to go through life-
Libsplained. I like that!
“and by the way DSc- I’m pretty sure I’ve run into you before on FR and you were just as nasty and condescending back then as you are now”
If you ran into me, and on that occasion started an argument as you have here, chances are pretty good that I said some hurtful things to you. Doesn’t mean they weren’t true, just as they are here.
You are either unwilling to understand what I have said, or too stupid. Either way, don’t care.
Some entertainment mogul, David Geffen, made a comment about being attracted to Keanu, so a rumor got started that Keanu was gay and married to Geffen.
People are stupid that way.
Satanic notion ???
Make sure to tell that to the nurses both in pre-op, post op and extended stay about all that. They’ll simply LOVE to hear all about it.. You might not like the service in return however.
[[I quote- ““yet even here almost everyone has bought into the Satanic notion that it’s a good thing for women to work outside the home,””]]
Not much ambiguity there fella- Not much to misunderstand at all- it’s unbiblical- as pointed out by many in the thread- yet you ignore it and turn immediately to insults- just like you always have-
[[Either way, don’t care.]]
Obviously you do- you keep posting- just gotta keep boosting your self esteem by putting others down eh?
[[and on that occasion started an argument as you have here,]]
LOL- argument? Since when is refuting an unbiblical statement an argument? The only one that ‘started something’ was you when you immediately resorted to insults because the bible refuted your claim!
[[Doesn’t mean they weren’t true... or too stupid.]]
You just can’t stop can you? Like i said- that’s a pretty sad way to go through life- bitter, nasty and insulting- Grow up!
careful now- You’ll get called all kinds of childish names for pointing out the obvious-
He was in The Matrix.
He is not gay.
He is a cutie ;)
“Not much ambiguity there fella- Not much to misunderstand at all”
Then why can’t you understand it? Everything you have said betrays an utter lack of comprehension of my position.
You fail, or refuse, to understand the difference between “sometimes necessary” and “always good.”
“Since when is refuting an unbiblical statement an argument?”
When you “refute” the argument with insults, then dishonestly accuse your interlocutor of starting the fight.
I think you do that to prevent the arguments against “equal employment” for women from being presented.
If—if—you’re not a troll, if you really do consider yourself to be a conservative, then you need to realize that you have adopted the leftwad position on this issue, and you are arguing it like a leftard. You haven’t presented an iota of reasoned argument in support of your position; all you have done is make it personal, while accusing me of what you do.
I can’t stop, you say? Well, stupidity and unreason weaponized and used against me do have a tendency to provoke me into replying.
Don’t like it? Go away.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.