It is possible “bad cholesterol” is an effect and not a cause. There is a correlation but may not be a causation. Science jumped the gun on cholesterol, both good and bad. They have never proven if cholesterol has an appreciable effect on you. The jury is still out, way out.
Cogent statement. Here’s the idiocy: “They” ignore the causes of inflammation and that cholesterol is the effect of the body trying to heal the vascular system. Inflammation is the disease, not the buildup they seek to remove WITH YET ANOTHER DRUG.
Failure to identify the problem serves no one but the researchers (grants), care providers (everyone is sick) and big pharma (selling the single-point solutions to that which ails everyone).
Hard to type that without a dozen sarc tags...but it’s all fact.
Cogent statement. Here’s the idiocy: “They” ignore the causes of inflammation and that cholesterol is the effect of the body trying to heal the vascular system. Inflammation is the disease, not the buildup they seek to remove WITH YET ANOTHER DRUG.
Failure to identify the problem serves no one but the researchers (grants), care providers (everyone is sick) and big pharma (selling the single-point solutions to that which ails everyone).
Hard to type that without a dozen sarc tags...but it’s all fact.