Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Beowulf9

it would take a lot more discussion to explain all the reasons (such as the confluence of the motion picture vertical monopolies being broken up,
the rise of TV, the UPA influence, the fall of many cartoon studios (WB MGM and Terry returned under new management several others like Universal/Lantz continued to make shorts into the late 1960s) that a cartoon like Colonel Bleep came about and found a home in the 1st decades of TV - mostly monetary, some artistic - it is a OK program (which had some input from Joseph Barbera) - it’s weak compared to really good programs from Jay Ward or even H-B but looks like a classic next to poor contemporary fare like “Clutch Cargo” or “Bucky and Pepito”


59 posted on 06/09/2019 5:05:54 PM PDT by Phil DiBasquette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Phil DiBasquette

Some of that stuff was intolerable. The frame would remain the same while dialogue was limited to lips movement. The whole damned show might only have half a dozen scenes.


73 posted on 06/09/2019 5:35:42 PM PDT by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: Phil DiBasquette

plus TV could do a 30 minute story instead of a cartoon short. Like Tom Terrific or Crusader Rabbit.


114 posted on 06/09/2019 8:41:48 PM PDT by morphing libertarian ( Use Comey's Report, Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson