re: Q #3349:
Okay, I'm embarrassed to ask this Question. I should know by now. Do original Q posts contain "bolded" words like this repost does? The following words are bolded. [attempt to discredit-cast conspiracy-LARP] and [DANGER], and both are in brackets.
Q posts this out of the blue without any corresponding media article, which is the norm for him.
If the bolded, bracketed words are the message, it sounds like Q may be warning of a "false flag" event intended to be blamed on Q and Q researchers.
p.s. Even if the contains bolding, that may have been the original message at the time too.
What do all ya'll think about this one?
e.g. 2042?
Praying Medic tweeted today to pray for Trump’s safety, he couldn’t attribute his source at this time.
Bold and brackets in the same places in that drop and the original.
-SB
Do original Q posts contain "bolded" words like this repost does? The following words are bolded.
[attempt to discredit-cast conspiracy-LARP] and [DANGER], and both are in brackets.
Original Q post on 8ch was not bolded.
The original post on qanon.pub was bolded?
Here is the same post 3127 on Qmap.pub
It appears the qanon.pub site added the bold, not Q. It may be significant, however, that Q reposted the bolded version?
LOL Schiff is a Russia expert, yeah that’s the ticket!
https://www.politico.com/magazine/amp/story/2019/05/26/adam-schiff-russia-hawk-524-226983
The Spy Case That Made Adam Schiff a Russia Hawk
Three decades before he railed against the Trump campaign, the future congressman prosecuted an FBI agent who was seduced by a Soviet spy.