Posted on 05/26/2019 12:16:08 PM PDT by ransomnote
I want to see a group necktie party in Terre Haute.
I saw it at night, upwards blue lighting. It was 75 degrees out, but I felt cold.
They looked like ghosts.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/05/when_barack_obama_declared_war_on_donald_trump.html
When Barack Obama declared war on Donald Trump
By Mark A. Hewitt
FTA:
The latest round of navel-gazing is the effort to name what has happened to President Donald Trump. It is a hoax or is it a coup, and when did it start?
I am a 2003 graduate of the Naval War College. We studied “war.” What happened to Donald Trump was an act of war.
...
President Trump’s enemies declared war on him for one reason and one reason only: vindictiveness. Vengeance. Who dares question the mighty O? In the words of Hillary Clinton, at a speech in the nation’s capital, referring to Trump, “For five years, he has led the birther movement to delegitimize our first black president” (italics mine).
...
If anyone took the time to research, the Democrats and the media declared war on Donald J. Trump before the 2012 elections, when he made some noises about running for president. When he became a candidate in 2015, the Democrat-media complex conspired to render a slow and painful death by a thousand cuts.
...
Obama’s army were the heads of the intelligence and law enforcement communities at the CIA, FBI, and DOJ. Their weapon was counterfeit papers that cut as sharply and deeply as any executioner’s knife. The Clappers, Comeys, and Brennans knew exactly how to have secondary and tertiary sources plant stories in the media.
...
Yeah, he kinda looked like a dead fish.
They all went home for Memorial Day Month immediately after that.
Sounds like another Q reader to me
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/05/time_to_pay_the_piper.html
Time to Pay the Piper
By Monty Pelerin
FTA:
...
Attorney General William Barr is now tasked to investigate the origins of the phony investigation against President Trump. The assault is over. The king is still alive and sounds of the piper can be faintly heard.
Speculation abounds regarding what was done and by whom. Like him or loathe him, Donald Trump is now on the offensive and he holds all the cards. Watergate may end up looking like a jaywalking violation by the time this investigation is over.
For the sake of the country, the investigation should be thorough, fair, and reasonably quick. The punishment need be commensurate with the offenses and painful enough to dissuade future corruption of this type. Sunshine, the best disinfectant, is anathema to both Dracula and the Deep State, but dawn is here.
...
President Obama, was on a mission to “transform the country.” When you view the United States as a cruel and exploitative country responsible for much of the horrific abuses in the world, it is natural to disrespect its history, traditions, and laws. (Recall Michelle saying when Obama was sworn in that it was the first time she was proud of our country.) Also, recall Obama’s messianic approach to politics, including his “we are the ones we are waiting for.”
To correct for these injustices, you cannot be restrained by the same customs and laws that created them. Numerous Obama actions suggest a willingness to break or at least bend the norms and laws of this country:
* Gunrunning to Mexico in an effort to gain support for mitigating the Second Amendment.
* Cover-up and lies about Benghazi.
* Weaponizing the IRS against conservatives.
* Spying on journalists.
...
The Intelligence Community appears to have been unleashed against American citizens before Trump announced his intentions to run for office. Given what was deemed to be an infinitesimal chance of his winning, one wonders why any attention at all was paid to Trump, at least initially. Perhaps the ease with which the controls and checks and balances were vitiated in prior FISA abuses and unmaskings, made it seem almost “free” or “riskless” to engage in such behavior. If this thinking is correct, there is likely evidence to be uncovered regarding other Republican candidates, especially those considered as real opponents.
...
Panic Sets In
When Trump won the nomination, it was considered a blessing for the Democrats. It was “impossible” for him to win. Had Clinton won, none of this skullduggery would have surfaced. Many committing the crimes would have been carried forward in the Clinton Administration. It all would have been buried in some remote part of the Swamp. It seemed risk-free to continue the dirty tricks and illegalities.
Fortunately, Trump won. Had he not, the norms and integrity of government would have shifted downward to a lower level. The Swamp Creatures would have been emboldened to violate even more checks/balances and laws against opponents and citizens in the future.
Unfortunately (for the bad guys), Trump won. Panic ensued. To protect themselves, the bad guys had to develop a narrative that would stop Trump even after he had done the impossible and won the election. The election had to be overturned! Careers and lives depended on it.
...
Anonymous 05/28/19 (Tue) 05:53:2179821e (9) No.6607268>>6607469 >>6607624 >>6607667
File (hide): 14a4ea85d6de944⋯.png (373.95 KB, 904x620, 226:155, ClipboardImage.png) (h) (u)
Photo Unearthed of John McCain with “Source D-Source E” of Steele Dossier — Sergei Millian
John McCain with “Source D – Source E” of the Steele dossier – via Paul Sperry
In January 2017 ABC News identified Sergei Millian as the key source of the Fusian GPS anti-Trump Dossier.
Sergei Millian has since been identified as as the mysterious “Source D” and “Source E” in the junk Steele dossier.
Millian was a source for the Steele dossier who disappeared after the election.
According to former Trump policy advisor George Papadopoulos, Millian, a Belarus-born businessman, became an unwitting source of Steele. Papadopoulos believes Millian was working with the FBI and therefore was trying to build a relationship with him, as reported in The Washington Post.
“Just re-looking at my notes from my convo with Chris Steele, I see that Chris and Kukes has some connection to Serge Millian, an emigre who is identified by FT as head of the Russian American Chamber of Commerce,” Kavalec told Ohr in the Nov. 21, 2016 email.
“According to what Chris said to me in early October, Millian has apparently disappeared,” i.e., left the U.S. and hasn’t been seen recently. I don’t know anything about Millian, but he is referenced in the FT story: https://ig.ft.com/sites/trumps-Russian-connections/
Ohr noted that the two had met regarding Steele’s information, which was later passed to the FBI.
“Kathy – thank you for taking the time to meet with us,” said Ohr in an email exchange on that day. “I really hope we can get something going here.”
Ohr was responding to an email Kavalec sent earlier in the day. Kukes “had left Russia because he said he was concerned he might be investigated- as I recall he said had gotten a summons to court on some issue.”
============================================================
Q Research General #8448 No.6607268
bkmk.
Joe DiGenova blows the lid off the real scandal: the Russia hoax was a cover-up effort for Obama’s political spying since 2012
By Thomas Lifso
FTA:
Hold onto your hats. At last, we are on the verge of getting to the bottom of the weaponization of the nation’s top law enforcement and spy agencies to spy on political opponents, and it is far bigger than obtaining bogus FISA Court warrants to spy on Carter Page. Barack Obama’s minions have been spying on his political opponents since before his 2012 re-election, and the entire Russiagate hoax was an effort to cover-up that ongoing spying.
...
The basic story is that Admiral Mike Rogers, who was head of the NSA in the spring of 2016, discovered that the NSA’s comprehensive database collecting all electronic communications in the United States was being searched by unauthorized FBI “contractors” and moved to cut-off that access. He also visited Donald Trump, after which Trump moved his campaign HQ out of Trump Tower. Trump’s much-derided claim that his campaign was “wiretapped” likely also were the result of gaining this insight from Admiral Rogers
The subsequent launch of Crossfire Hurricane and the effort to obtain FISA warrants were not to initiate spying on the Trump campaign, but rather to provide legal grounding for the spying efforts on political opponents that had been underway for years.
Sundance at Conservative Treehouse picked up on the DiGenova interview and in his inimitable fashion lays out the background story from evidence already on the public record here, complete with many hyperlinks to sources. It is a long and complex post, but some of the key conclusions.
...
Joe DiGenova dropped one other bombshell that remains to be explored: that he believes that the NSA database contains the 30,000 emails that Hillary Clinton deleted from her server, and that the two US attorneys tasked with investigating the scandals will access those emails in the course of their investigations. Recall that US Attorney for Utah John Huber is investigating the handling of the dropped prosecution of her violations of national security law with her home brew server and possible crimes related to the Clinton Foundation, including presumably, the Uranium One acquisition of US uranium reserves by Russian interests and the massive donations to the Clinton Foundation.
Sarah Sanders vs. Chuck Todd: Does The President Expect James Comey To Be Arrested For Treason?
CHUCK TODD: I want to ask you about the decision to give the attorney general this unilateral authority to declassify intelligence. The order says the attorney general should consult with relevant agency heads but not that he has to. Why did the president not force the attorney general to consult with the, with the DNI and the head of the CIA? Here he’s giving him unilateral authority not to do it. Only saying he should do it but he doesn’t have to. Why?
SARAH SANDERS: The president has total confidence in the attorney general and his ability —
CHUCK TODD: But not the intelligence community?
SARAH SANDERS: — to make those decisions. We expect — certainly. That’s why we expect that the attorney general will consult with them on matters that he needs that guidance and advice from them. Certainly they work in lock step on a number of things. I don’t see this to be any different. The bottom line here is there was a lot of corruption at the FBI and the DOJ. We see constantly more and more things that have come out of that. And the president wants transparency and he’s given the attorney general the ability to put that transparency in place, make those decisions. And we’re not like at all concerned that the attorney general is not going to do everything that is necessary to make sure we’re protecting important intelligence that is vital to our national security.
CHUCK TODD: I’m trying to understand what outcome the president expects. He’s, he tweeted the following: “My campaign for president was conclusively spied on. Nothing like this has ever happened in American politics. A really bad situation. Treason means long jail sentences and this was treason.” Why did the president ask the attorney general to do an investigation if he’s already come to a conclusion, already decided what the penalty should be? And I think has already determined what the jail sentences should be? Isn’t this the president already playing judge and jury and putting his thumb on the scale here for whatever investigation he claims he wants Mr. Barr to do?
SARAH SANDERS: That’s pretty rich coming from the media who relentlessly covered and accused the president for over two years of being part of this massive election interference, something that never took place. The idea that anybody now says that the president doesn’t have the right and not only that Americans deserve the truth to push back and find out where all of this started is absurd. Literally for day after day after day the media and Democrats in Congress called the president a traitor to his own country and said that he cheated to become president. I mean the idea of that is absolutely outrageous that he had to endure that for two years. And now he wants to know where and why it started. And all of a sudden that’s a big deal? That is insane.
CHUCK TODD: Sarah, I didn’t ask about him —
SARAH SANDERS: I think the president is doing exactly what —
CHUCK TODD: No, no, no, no, Sarah I did not ask —
SARAH SANDERS: — he should be. And I think America is glad that he’s asking for that transparency.
CHUCK TODD: I didn’t ask whether he should ask those questions. He’s not asking questions anymore. He’s already made a judgment. That is much different. He’s already — will he accept a result of the attorney general saying, you know what, “Everything was done legally and on the up and up, Mr. President.” Will he accept that result from Bill Barr?
SARAH SANDERS: We already know that there was an outrageous amount of corruption that took place at the FBI. They leaked information. They lied. They were specifically working trying to take down the president, trying to hurt the president. We’ll leave the, the final call up to the attorney general and he’ll get to the bottom of it. But we think Americans deserve the truth.
CHUCK TODD: So he doesn’t —
SARAH SANDERS: The president’s asked for that. And we should expect nothing less.
CHUCK TODD: So the president is not going to accept exoneration if that’s what Bill Barr finds?
SARAH SANDERS: Look, I’m not going to get ahead of what the final conclusion is. But we already know that there was a high level of corruption that was taking place. We’ve seen that in the IG investigation that has already happened.
There’s a lot more there that we still need to know. And we’re going to let the attorney general do his job.
CHUCK TODD: Well it sounds like you’re not — that’s my point. It doesn’t sound like you want him to do his job. It sounds like you, the president has already determined the outcome.
SARAH SANDERS: Chuck, that’s the reason that he’s granted the attorney general the authority to declassify that information, to look at all the documents necessary is so that we can get to the very bottom of what happened. Once again, we already know about some wrongdoing. The president’s not wrong in that. But he wants to know everything that happened and how far and how wide it went. We know that there was corruption. Let’s see —
CHUCK TODD: Does he expect criminal charges? Does he expect — he’s accused James Comey of treason. Does he expect Jim Comey to be arrested?
SARAH SANDERS: Again, we’re going to let the attorney general make that determination as he gets to the conclusion of this investigation.
CHUCK TODD: So the president, he’s not going to accept —
SARAH SANDERS: But we certainly expect the people that were responsible and that were part of this unprecedented obstruction and corruption at the FBI, those people should certainly be held responsible and be held accountable and the president expects that to take place.
CHUCK TODD: So he expects an outcome that he wants, not an outcome that the facts lead to.
SARAH SANDERS: Chuck, I think you’re trying to muddy the waters too much here. We already know, once again that there was wrongdoing.
CHUCK TODD: I think what’s rich is who’s muddying waters.
SARAH SANDERS: Now we want to know how much there was. I don’t think it’s — well, I don’t think it’s crazy to want to know how far and how wide the corruption at the FBI was. And that’s what the president has asked the attorney general to find. And we’ll what happens.
Oh, okay, good point. Maybe he’s with Ruthie.
▶Anonymous 05/28/19 (Tue) 00:52:403b79a9 (45) No.6606284>>6606327 >>6606360 >>6606372 >>6606617 >>6606801 >>6606847 >>6606867
File (hide): ba8a7d12cdfa299⋯.png (806.74 KB, 909x1501, 909:1501, ClipboardImage.png) (h) (u)
May 24, 2019
>>6606262
>sauce or gtfo
From 5/24, apparently.
Q Research General #8447 No.6606284
This is just one family, just one little slice of Americana ... and most of us voted for Trump, but I was more than a little surprised about some of the millennials being on board whom I thought were a bit left-leaning ... and almost everyone being MORE AWARE, and MORE MILITANT than I expected.
...............
That is reassuring and hopeful. God bless your family.
Also, probably not everyone who died in service for our nation is a veteran.
..................
You made me think... Seth Rich. He definitely loved his country.
Vengeance. Who dares question the mighty O? In the words of Hillary Clinton, at a speech in the nation’s capital, referring to Trump, “For five years, he has led the birther movement to delegitimize our first black president”
..............
Pithy. Explains the genesis of the treason: narcissistic pettiness.
Such valiant, noble men. May they rest in the Lord.
Prayers for their families.
Nice family you have there.
I get along VERY will with my MIL and FIL but my wife’s sisters and husbands are a total loss. Thankfully they live in Minnesota where we see them once a year...at best.
I’ve no direct kin left but I do have cousins nearby and had to remove them from any contact over the years. Contemptible folk they are, all of ‘em.
Happy you shared your story. Best to you and your grand family!
Now that’s funny!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.