Posted on 05/16/2019 10:28:47 AM PDT by ransomnote
The ideas [They] would stick in my head. Later I would learn a Probe was a car. I'm glad [They] didn't use that, I had problems passing a nickel once.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
OMG!!! ROFL! that would indeed hurt!
What a great meme!!
Man, your brain is running HOT!!!
What are you on?? :)
gisd O
that is SO horrifying... but I actually laughed! Imagine the LOOKS around the dog table!
We now know as well that either Comey or Lynch lied. Lynch is claiming she did not instruct Comey to call the Hillary thing a matter. Stay tuned!
https://frankreport.com/2019/05/20/lauren-salzman-the-horrors-of-raniere-continue/ What is really crazy about this is General Hospital has a story line about a sex cult ongoing. Hmmmmm Anyway the link is for those not following.
I am sure you already knew this.
Interesting info from LL transcripts:
Mr. Jordan. Ms. Lynch, so in Mr. Comey’s book he says this:
Comey quoted you as saying, “Call it a matter.”
He responded, “Why would I do that?”
“’Just call it a matter,’ she snapped back.”
Is that accurate?
Ms. Lynch. I haven’t read his book, so I can’t say if that’s in
there or not.
Mr. Jordan. I’m reading directly from his book.
He said call it a matter or you said, “Call it a matter.”
His response was, “Why would I do that?”
He said you snapped back with, “Just call it a matter.”
Is that accurate?
Ms. Lynch. Well, again, leaving aside whether it’s in the book
or not, that’s not my recollection of the meeting. But I can’t explain
to you why he remembers it that way.
Mr. Jordan. Okay. He said this in his book.
“The Attorney General seemed to be directing me to align me with
the Clinton campaign strategy,” he wrote, adding caustically that,
quote, “The FBI didn’t do matters.”
So Comey is lying or Lynch is lying. Probably both.
Yes... that’s what I was thinking. The moment when all eyes turned on him. BTW what did we learn from Assange today? Have been busy AFK and must have missed it.
The Latest: New Ukrainian president disbands parliament
https://www.foxnews.com/world/the-latest-new-ukrainian-president-disbands-parliament
So true.
Unrelated....(well probably related because it all seems to be connected at some level) ....
https://buffalonews.com/2019/05/19/why-buffalos-child-molesting-priests-werent-arrested/
“””Man, your brain is running HOT!!!
What are you on?? :)”””
Altimeter is reading 40k’ view. Casting a glance far and wide at the whole picture.
Looks like Collins setting the stage, but I’m whupped.
If you see TEXOKIE tell her I said Mom had some of that paperwork custom framed and hung in the hallway, and some more stuck on the fridge door. It’s still there.
You know how mothers are about “my child”....
TEXIE will know what you mean. :)
nite
.
Jordan was READING FROM THE BOOK, and that dumbazz Lynch had the TEMERITY to say “I havent read his book, so I cant say if thats in there or not.”
How the Reps manage to not jump over the tables and THROTTLE these liars and crooks is beyond me.
Maybe they should. It would bring attention to the Dem’s dastardly behaviors.
meme of the month!!!
-... -— -— — -.-.—
Ugh, given what we now know about Mueller’s “integrity”, Lynch was obviously lying through her teeth covering for a fellow swamp derp like Mueller.
Starting on Page 71:
Ms. Jackson Lee. My final questions, I have been troubled by escalating attacksagainst the Department of Justice, the Special Counsel’s Office, and the FBI, attacks against the independence of the institutions, the integrity of their employees, and the legitimacy of the DOJ’s and FBI’s investigation. As I am sure you are aware, President Trump and his allies repeatedly described Special Counsel Mueller and his investigation as illegitimate and politically biased. On November27, 2018, President Trump tweeted in reference to the special counsel, quote, “The fake news media builds Bob Mueller up as a saint, when in actuality, he is the exact opposite. He is doing tremendous damage to our criminal justice system, where he is only looking at one side and not the other. Heroes will come of this, and it won’t be Mueller and his terrible gang of angry Democrats. Look at their past, look at where they come from. The now $30million witch hunt continues, and they have got nothing but ruined lives. Where is the server? Let the terrible people go back to the Clinton Foundation and Justice Department.” On December3, 2018, President Trump tweeted, quote, “Bob Mueller, who is a much different man than people think. He is out of control. Band of angry Democrats don’t want the truth, they only want lies. The truth is very bad for their mission.” I will note that Robert Mueller is a well-known, and has been well-known as a lifelong Republican and as well as a man of integrity. Generally speaking, does being identified as Democrat mean a prosecutor would be too conflicted to conduct a fair investigation of a Republican or vice versa.
Ms. Lynch. Absolutely not. The political affiliation of the prosecutors has no relevance on investigations they conduct in the public corruption/slash political realm or anywhere else. People are entitled to have their opinions, but in my experience, the dedicated prosecutors and investigators that I have worked with for years check those opinions at the door and focus solely on gathering the facts, gathering the evidence, and determining whether or not there has been any wrongdoing. That has to be the same process for everyone, whether there is a D or an R in front of the name of the prosecutor, the subject, the witness, or the target of the investigation because the reality is, I think people spend a lot of time and invest a lot of emotion in thinking about big cases or cases that get a lot of attention. But when you are a professional prosecutor, you know there is always another case. There is no one case that is worth leaving your integrity behind for. There is no one case or issue that is worth compromising longstanding values and norms to make.
Ms. Jackson Lee. These are yes-or-no questions. Are you aware of any, quote, “conflicted people” on the special counsel’s team?
Ms. Lynch. No, I am not.
Ms. Jackson Lee. Do you agree with the characterization that the special counsel’s investigation is a witch hunt?
Ms. Lynch. No, I do not.
Ms. Jackson Lee. Director Comey described the team as an all-star team of people whose names I have known for years. Do you agree with the characterization these are stellar people?
Ms. Lynch. I don’t know them all, but the ones that I am aware of are definitely stellar prosecutors and people of great integrity.
Ms. Jackson Lee. Your general impression of the individuals on the special counsel’s team, professional or not professional?
Ms. Lynch. Certainly very professional in terms of the ones that I know and the work that I have seen.
Ms. Jackson Lee. Do you agree with the characterization that the special counsel’s team is out of control and are not seeking the truth?
Ms. Lynch. That is not based on anything that I have seen.
Ms. Jackson Lee. How confident are you that members of the special counsel team are conducting their investigation based solely on the facts and the law, not their political affiliation?
Ms. Lynch. Based on my knowledge of how Robert Mueller conducts business, both as former FBI Director and as a member of the Department of Justice, a former U.S. Attorney, a former leader of the Department of Justice, someone who holds its values dear to his heart, I am convinced that he is leading them in a very strong and positive manner.
Ms. Jackson Lee. Is there any reason to believe that they are trying to undermine the rule of law, or is there any reason that Mr. Mueller should be publicly attacked?
Ms. Lynch. None at all, none at all.
Ms. Jackson Lee. Do you agree with the President’s characterization that Mr. Mueller is damaging the criminal justice system?
Ms. Lynch. No, not at all.
Ms. Jackson Lee. And you would, in a couple of words, characterize the special counsel investigation in what terms, handled correctly, professionally?
Ms. Lynch. Well, from what I have seen from public reporting since I have no visibility into it, it has been handled professionally with great discretion, which is completely appropriate, and frankly, should be the norm and the goal for every investigation.
Ms. Jackson Lee. My last question. How would you characterize his credibility, his integrity, and his work product?
Ms. Lynch.Are you referring to Mr. Mueller?
Ms. Jackson Lee. Mr. Mueller.
Ms. Lynch. Well, based upon my knowledge of Mr. Mueller and my observations of him over the years, he is of the highest integrity, his work product has always been exemplary that I have had occasion to see, and I have great confidence in him.
Ms. Jackson Lee. Thank you so very much for your testimony.
:-D
Have a nice nap!
I guess it depends on where one lived. In Chicago, there were always signs “deliveries in rear”.
Couldn’t unload in the front. I know..it was a stretch...
Q During your tenure in the New York field office, as the Assistant Director in Charge, did you have occasion to be investigating or have in possession of the New York field office a laptop that was somehow associated to an Anthony Weiner?
[snip]
pg 25
is that laptop now?
A I think we still have it. I don't know off the top of my head, but I think we still have it.
Q So, to the best of your knowledge, it hasn't been returned to anyone or --
A I don't think so.
Q -- hasn't been destroyed?
A No. And there's -- right when we -- when we take a -- there's a mirror. It's mirrored. You don't operate off the actual device. I believe we still have it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.