Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Clarence Thomas’ moment may finally have arrived
AP ^ | 5/4/2019 | JESSICA GRESKO

Posted on 05/04/2019 1:59:16 PM PDT by upsdriver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
A nice little article about Justice Clarence Thomas.
1 posted on 05/04/2019 1:59:16 PM PDT by upsdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

“A nice little article about Justice Clarence Thomas”

By the AP(!)


2 posted on 05/04/2019 2:04:25 PM PDT by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

I have admired him since the Anita Hill onslaught. He stood firm and earned his place on the court. Reading his opinions, mostly dissenting, has just increased my admiration for him.


3 posted on 05/04/2019 2:04:40 PM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

Wow, hard to believe he is the longest serving justice now. I’m getting old.


4 posted on 05/04/2019 2:06:47 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

“Nice”?

Calling Justice Thomas “far-right” is NICE?

We have different interpretations of that word, I suppose.

Then again, during Reagan’s tenure as President, Thomas was considered by some to be centrist slightly right, but things change, don’t they?

I refuse to let the barking moonbats define what is “mainstream”, as they are so far left Marx himself is considered reactionary.


5 posted on 05/04/2019 2:08:15 PM PDT by Don W (When blacks riot, neighbourhoods and cities burn. When whites riot, nations and continents burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

My theory is that Thurgood Marshall assumed GHWB would be re-elected easily in 1992 because his poll numbers were so high right after the Gulf War. Bush was able to nominate Clarence Thomas only because of Marshall’s retirement. If Marshall had remained on the court until his death, Bill Clinton would have chosen his replacement—for sure a black leftist (and probably a woman because Hillary would have demanded it).


6 posted on 05/04/2019 2:12:15 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

Roberts ain’t no moderate conservative. If anything, he is a moderate liberal. His mess in the Obammy healthcare bill proved he cannot be a conservative of any type. He ruled with the left that day on the biggest case in decades.


7 posted on 05/04/2019 2:13:59 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (Russia and Putin didn't make me vote for Trump, HILLARY DID!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don W
Calling Justice Thomas “far-right” is NICE?

Considering that anyone to the right of Bill Clinton is considered "far right" by the media, I'd take that term with a grain of salt. If Justice Thomas is "far right", I'm proud to consider myself the same and stand right along side him. In the eyes of the real world, we're normal.

For the most part, this article was quite fair.

8 posted on 05/04/2019 2:18:47 PM PDT by upsdriver (WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom

And he’s still just 70—young in Justice years!


9 posted on 05/04/2019 2:23:04 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

“Far right.”

For the sake of symmetry, I’ sure Jessica Gresko uses “far left” when she writes about Ruth Buzzi Ginsburg, Breyer, and the Wide Latina.


10 posted on 05/04/2019 2:29:47 PM PDT by SharpRightTurn (Chuck Schumer--giving pond scum everywhere a bad name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

Judge Thomas is a treasure.

Thank God he’s there to serve as a counter example for Dorkbama the Muslim eunuch quota boy.

The judge is a genius.
The ex-president is excrement.


11 posted on 05/04/2019 2:31:33 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver
Robin says the question will be whether the court’s more conservative justices — Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Samuel Alito — can get Chief Justice John Roberts, a more moderate conservative, to go along.

Wrong. Actually Mr Robin (a political science professor who has appeared on NPR, MSNBC, and other media outlets, i.e., a statist) the question is whether the court's more liberal justices can either outlive or avoid retirement before the end Trump Administration. If so, Roberts becomes irrelevant.

12 posted on 05/04/2019 2:35:46 PM PDT by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s^2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

I wish he would retire and take a well-deserved retirement, and give Trump his suggestion for his replacement.


13 posted on 05/04/2019 2:40:11 PM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

Hi.

“Thomas is consistently on the court’s far right.”

I consider Justice Thomas, “normal.” I consider Ginsburg and Kagan “far left.”

AP.

5.56mm


14 posted on 05/04/2019 2:43:04 PM PDT by M Kehoe (DRAIN THE SWAMP! BUILD THE WALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

Roberts,,,
Exactly!
He ,at least, caved.


15 posted on 05/04/2019 2:45:10 PM PDT by Big Red Badger (Despised by the Despicable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

He should have been Chief Justice


16 posted on 05/04/2019 2:56:50 PM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Red Badger

The deep state fear losing their blackmail over justices. What if the blackmail was exposed? Prison or losing the black robes? Good question to ask a deep stater.


17 posted on 05/04/2019 3:01:04 PM PDT by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

Interesting note that the McDonough v Smith heard a couple weeks ago saw Justice Thomas carefully supporting a frail RBG when they left the bench.


18 posted on 05/04/2019 3:06:13 PM PDT by jjotto (Next week, BOOM!, for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

Three words that really irritate me:

Chief Justice Roberts

We were promised a strict constructionist by 43. We got a lackey instead.

I have less use for 43 than 44. And that is saying a lot.


19 posted on 05/04/2019 3:08:25 PM PDT by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Why? He’s still got many more years on the court.


20 posted on 05/04/2019 3:09:03 PM PDT by Fido969 (In!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson