To: rockrr; x; wardaddy; Pelham; DiogenesLamp; Dick Bachert; GSWarrior; John S Mosby
The United States are & were a Federation--a Federation of countries, if you will. Personally, I can conceive of no basis for Lee to have made any other choice that the one he made. There could have been no conceivable moral justification for his waging war on his own homeland.
Would you seek to justify any American military officer--northern or southern, supporting a UN war against any American State? I cannot! There is no way the Quisling rationalization could ever be acceptable.
Quisling Personality
189 posted on
05/01/2019 9:26:48 AM PDT by
Ohioan
To: Ohioan
Nice work
Id never read that one
190 posted on
05/01/2019 9:33:30 AM PDT by
wardaddy
(I applaud Jim Robinson for his comments on the Southern Monumnets decision ...thank you)
To: Ohioan
Personally, I can conceive of no basis for Lee to have made any other choice that the one he made. Of course you can't.
There could have been no conceivable moral justification for his waging war on his own homeland.
In the same way that the police have to struggle with "no conceivable moral justification" for performing their duties? And who is to say that he would have to wage war on his own homeland? Do you conclude that George Washington waged war on his own homeland during the Whiskey Rebellion?
Would you seek to justify any American military officer--northern or southern, supporting a UN war against any American State?
No. Why do you ask?
191 posted on
05/01/2019 10:02:50 AM PDT by
rockrr
( Everything is different now...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson