Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
They were nations that had given up some of their sovereignty so that they could face England and other potential adversaries as a Unified block.

They gave up everything that makes a sovereign nation a sovereign nation.

New York and others reserved the right to take back the sovereignty they had given up if they ever felt that it was necessary to do so.

One cannot be responsible for the misconceptions of New York or the other states that they state in their ratification documents.

101 posted on 04/29/2019 3:57:10 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg
They gave up everything that makes a sovereign nation a sovereign nation.

And were not afraid to do so precisely because the Declaration of Independence guaranteed them the right to get those powers back.

You forget. 11 years after the Declaration of Independence. Nobody forgot they had the right to leave.

One cannot be responsible for the misconceptions of New York or the other states that they state in their ratification documents.

The fact that no one challenged their quite public assertion that they had the right to reassume those powers makes the theory that they could not leave, the misconception.

Do you have perhaps some contemporary document (~1787) arguing to the contrary of what New York, Virginia and Delaware asserted was their right? I've got three aces. What are you holding to answer them?

112 posted on 04/29/2019 4:12:53 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson