To: Red Badger
So that sounds like a defective repeat, that winds up being helpful.
Interesting.
2 posted on
04/19/2019 10:39:57 AM PDT by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: Red Badger
3 posted on
04/19/2019 10:44:25 AM PDT by
bankwalker
(Immigration without assimilation is an invasion.)
To: Red Badger
My sister says, “I will not be defined by a doughnut.”
To: Red Badger
Ya eat less, ya weigh less. It’s that simple!
9 posted on
04/19/2019 11:20:53 AM PDT by
W.
(Natty Light: The beer so nice, you'll taste it twice!)
To: Red Badger
“Medics have known...”
The tighter the genes, the heavier the patient, and therefore more medics required to lift them into the gurney.
11 posted on
04/19/2019 11:23:59 AM PDT by
fruser1
To: Red Badger
The team found that people with two copies of these particular variants - one in over 1,000 people in the UK - were on average 2.5 kg lighter than people without the variants and had a 50 per cent lower risk of type 2 diabetes and heart disease. 5.5 pounds doesn't seem to be enough to reduce disease risk by 50%. Maybe this gene has a direct impact on the heart and blood sugar with weight loss just being a side effect.
14 posted on
04/19/2019 12:33:28 PM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(Leave the job, leave the clearance. It should be the same rule for the Swamp as for everyone else.)
To: Red Badger
"Scientists at Cambridge University say drugs to keep people slim are now a possibility after they identified the handful of genetic factors that prevent overeating." No, that's not what they said.
They said they found an association between certain genetic factors and outcomes like obesity. It's the reporter that substituted "overeating" for "obesity".
18 posted on
04/19/2019 12:57:19 PM PDT by
mlo
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson