The Truth About Q-Anon

Dr. Seb Gorka homepage ^ | April 8, 2019 | Dr. Seb Gorka

[BiggBob]

That’s Merely a coincidence
I saw a tweet earlier from a Twitter follower of Sebastian gorka’s second cousins ex-wife that says it doesn’t mean anything.

LoL

[Conservative Gato]

Funny how you demand answers but fail to answer those directed towards you.

Maybe you can explain to us why they are BOTH on the same attack-Q page?

It is strange you and your maga coalition site being on the same side as our corrupt media in attacking this Q movement. You will also have to understand, the Q movement has proved time and again it is on the MAGA train (see my post about a now peaceful North Korea a few posts ago). There have been plenty of pictures of American Patriots around the country showing their support for President Trump and the Q movement.

It does beg the question on why your so-called maga site would be on the same attack-Q narrative, the same coming from our enemy media, in attacking this MAGA movement. It's very hypocritical of you to demand answers of others and ignore the questions you don't like but I've seen that in trollish behavior before.

CGato

[Conservative Gato]

NICE!!!

WWG1WGA!!!

CGato

[mac_truck]

Because you say so?

No, because there is a reasonable scientific explanation for what is shown in that time lapse video still that is corroborated up by several competent independent eyewitnesses.

Not to mention the complete absurdity of the assertion that a ballistic missile was launched from a submarine in the direction of AF1 from the middle of a highly populated area like Puget Sound...but no one saw it.

So go ahead and present your corroborating evidence for the 'missile launch'. Which submarine commanders were involved? How high up the chain of command did the conspiracy go? Which foreign governments went on high alert, scrambled fighter jets or complained publicly about the unauthorized ballistic missile launch?

And what was the White House response to this attempt on the President's life? I'm sure the highly trained Secret squirrels on the Q-team of didn't take this attempt on the President's life lightly and allow the perps to just get away with it..did they?

/lolz...

[bagster]

Big deal.

So why did the records state "consulting fees" rather than "whatever event".

Your argument is getting less strident as you become less sure of your facts, sir.

I don't blame you, though. It's one thing to come across all blustery and Doctor Know-It-All and quite another to have your B.S. challenged with the actual facts YOU cited in the first place.

Consulting fees are not "events".

You can look that up.

What do you make of this line in a Q post regarding your precious money laund...er, I mean PAC.

Monthly installment payments made to ‘names’ who can attract ‘more donations’? (the “wheel”)

So they pay Gorka for "consulting" and he's such a big 'wheel' that other people donate to the PAC because his name's attached.

So basically, Gorka did nothing but sell his name so the PAC could increase incoming cash. Again, that's a real world lesson for you.

That's just part of the whole PAC scam. And what do you make of what bukkake Cates said about paying that ex convict and known fraudster all them duckets? Nothing? Is bukkake all you got on that one?

And then there's this, from Q, in the same post.

Track donations vs. expenses.
Admin, fundraising, strategy & research, etc etc expenses highly inflated?
Monthly installment payments made to ‘names’ who can attract ‘more donations’? (the “wheel”)
How much ‘donated’ money was actually spent promoting MAGA / PRO_MAGA candidates (indirectly) vs. internal costs or ‘wheel’ costs?

Pay attention to the term "inflated costs" and the question about how much "donated" money was actually spent promoting MAGA and PRO MAGA candidates as opposed to internal costs and wheel (Gorka) payments.

And now we come to the crux of the matter. The "why" of Gorka bad-mouthing Q.

When you offer ‘better’ goods and services for free there is no longer a need to ‘donate’ ‘purchase’ and/or ‘follow’ those who would use such platforms to enrich themselves. (hence the ‘attacks’)

Q says here that the Q team offers "better" goods and services (MAGA) for the low, low price of NOTHING, than these organizations (and a host of other so-called paytriots like Jerome Corsi, Alex Jones, and our very own LS).

Bottom line is, Q cuts into these people's profits because he offers a "better product" for no cast, and THAT's why the fake MAGAS of the world talk trash on the legitimate entity that is Q.

We find this phenomenon all throughout the political world and over the internet. As people vie for "followers" and "donations". From Twitter, to YouTube, to cable television, and even to so-called MAGA pacs.

Calling yourself MAGA don't necessarily make you MAGA, btw. MAGA means a specific thing, and we all know whaet that is. And lining your pocket ain't on the docket.

And that is why that article at the top of this thread exists and why you are extolling it and Gorka and the MAGA Coalition's virtue so vigorously.

Is that enough truth for you all at once?

Let that sink in before you pop off with some dopey cliché which you've repeated ad nauseum all along this thread.

[bagster]

So you called Seb Gorka a grifter because he exposed the QAnon hoax (like many others I might add.)

Yea, that's part of it. I was wondering exactly why a so-called MAGA man would bash MAGA Q like that, and then it hit me. I explained it very well in that last huge post I just made. I won't repeat it.

But yea, he's a grifter for sure.

Or else he wouldn't bash Q. Why would he?

Gorka's supposedly MAGA. Q is definitely MAGA. So what's up with THAT?

I get the same puzzlement from MAGA FReepers bashing us MAGA Qtards. It's hard to make sense of. But I have some theories, and with the help of Q, I understand now. One good thing about Q is, he encourages you to see past the fog and once your brain is trained to throw off the shackles of a lifetime of indoctrination, things become very clear.

Yea, Gorka is about Gorka. Pure politician, and I say that in the most disparaging way possible.

There are very few Donald Trump type patriots in DC. They can mostly be found in the Military and "certain" intelligence services and maybe low-level law enforcement (FBI). And that's why he surrounds himself with military patiots and not Gorkas. Ya dig?

[EasySt]

When you get done playing “Chew Toy” for our guard dogs, perhaps you’ll
Respond to my posts.

I won’t hold my breath.

~Easy

[Boogieman]

“I started following this Q movement about a month after they started posting and kept an open mind about it.”

So before or after all the initial 4chan predictions that turned out spectacularly wrong? (martial law, Hillary arrested, military tribunals, etc)

“When we found out North Korea fell and there would be peace between them and us, we knew this info far before anyone else did through this Q back channel.”

Yet that still turned out to be just more false info, as Q claimed wrongly that there was already an agreement in place with the summit just being theater, and we see now that no, there is no agreement and NK is still playing the same old games.

[Boogieman]

Some of those aren’t even predictions (for example, FISA abuse has already been “made public”). Others are patently obvious (there will be reports on stuff, well, yeah, duh). Others are certainly not going to happen (your military tribunal fantasy, etc).

[Boogieman]

Yeah, sure, don’t bet me. Fraidy cat.

[bagster]

Squirt! Squirt!

Oh, hey. That reminds me. Brian Cates dropped this off for you in the lobby.

He said something about requesting another blumpkin? Not sure what that means, but thought I'd pass it on, since we're pals now.

[BiggBob]

You spelled competent wrong

PS bagster didn't claim it came from sub,

YOU DID

Good job debunking yourself Lol

Man bagster no wonder these guys can't connect any dots they don't even have the to sense to remember what they said

Nice try though mac

Hawaii missile alert

[bagster]

Lol your faux outrage
Pew! pew!

Extra credit on that one, BB, for going right to the heart of the shill's argument.

FINISH HIM!

[Conservative Gato]

Such terrible info you are getting.

Do you realize it’s our corrupt enemy media still propping up North Korea as the boogeyman for their own political purposes? You’re so behind the times and have been taken in by their lies.

BTW, the NSA just trolled all of you anti-Q folks in the pic, M. Thatcher just posted in this thread, LOL.

CGato

[bagster]

Sara Carter and Jon Solomon are plugged into the White House via the Q team?

Yeppers, they are.

I'd prove it to you but you already don't believe what I would tell you. So I won't waste my time.

Hint: Q told me.

Ahahahahahahahaha.

See? Told ya you wouldn't believe.

You're gonna have to pull your head outta your coolo before you can even hear me, goodman. And I say that with all affection. Truly.

[bagster]

Tell us also about the people posting as QAnon who also seek payments as they “decode” their posts.

And not a one of those so-called "paytriots" are on the list of "free" Q research that BB provided you.

Your false equivalency is wearing thin, shill.

You are the hoax.

[bagster]

maybe you should start your own book where you can tell people what sebastian gorka’s book says.

No need. He's doing that right here on this thread. Sadly, he can't monetize.

[bagster]

The NSA just posted this on its official Twitter feed.

https://twitter.com/NSAGov/status/1116774531195183104

What a strange coincidence.

Would you be a dear and post that on the Q thread, Maggie (if you haven't already)?

I bet we see THAT in a Q posting today.

[BiggBob]

That's your opinion

Lol you claiming you've seen the Fisa docs

Maybe you can tell us the difference between alleged and made public?

I wonder what me Senator Graham and Senator Feinstein know that you don't?

Feinstein question 9th circuit judge nominee Judge Collins about military trials for domestic terrorists

Senator Graham questions SCOTUS nominee Kavanaugh about the difference between civilian and military law

Don't worry you'll know soon enough it has to be frustrating for you being months behind the news curve

[bagster]

No, because there is a reasonable scientific explanation for what is shown in that time lapse video still that is corroborated up by several competent independent eyewitnesses.

You're probly right, Mickety. You've convinced me. It was a helicopter hiding in the clouds shooting down a beam of light. It just LOOKED like a missile launch.

I just don't know what gets into me sometimes.

*rolls eyes*

But on the serious tip, whatever bogosity you come up with, that was a missile launch. Undeniably so. The more you screech that it wasn't the more the fool you look.

p.s. Don't worry. Retribution (PAIN) is coming.