[Cletus.D.Yokel]

:: If he’s not a Q believer he’s right on the edge. ::

I will, again caution everyone to shy away from using the terms “belief” and “believer” when projecting our understanding of Q/QAnon.

In using those terms, it emboldens the naysayers to mock the operation as a “Qook conspiracy theory” or a “Qult” or simply a “LARP” inspired internet legend.

We should always move forward with an understanding that Q/QAnon is a focused communications operations being used to inform patriots of the behind the scenes activities in Washington DC, both good and ill.

I don’t “believe” in Q anymore than I “believe” in my cat. My cat just IS, ergo, Q simply IS.

[defconw]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KP3rVRghHRE&feature=youtu.be Paysuer video for those interested.

[Steven W.]

I remember the early time that “Q” things were being posted on FR broadly and the “discussions” that would ensue. I’d tell the skeptics to just ANSWER THE QUESTIONS. That is the essence of “Q” & why these threads have largely ignored that question and focused on the subject matter at large. I don’t see that happening elsewhere, except (old) reddit/r/greatawakening.