[haffast]

"""What’s your point? I posted in my first paragraph that Neon Revolt was mistaken about being first. I had already seen info on Knight’s of Malta many months before I ran across Neon Revolt. In fact it was before Q ever surfaced.

And I am not going to slam all people involved in any one particular religion. I believe that evil people have infiltrated them all, but there are also good people in them all.

My main point was that having people infiltrated into the Knights of Malta would have benefits for smugglers - one of them being Pass Ports."""

===========================================================

To: greeneyes; bagster; bitt; defconw; generally; ransomnote; TEXOKIE; All

KNIGHTS OF MALTA- Finally being mentioned and researched by anons. A certain citizen Journalist(not Neon Revolt) explained many months ago, that the Knights of Malta likely had a role in a lot of the various types of smuggling etc. PASSPORTS-very handy to have a reliable source for the various Cabal doings.

@NeonRevolt Great Awakening PRO

#Anons started digging on the #KnightsOfMalta... after it was mentioned here, first!

https://gab.com/NeonRevolt/posts/Zm1EZ3lGSVFLK05mQjhXenBpR01CQT09

As a side note, there was a big spat between the Knights of Malta and Pope Francis right around the time POTUS was elected. Francis won and the head of the order was replaced.

1,488 posted on 4/6/2019, 7:33:27 AM by greeneyes

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1481 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

=========================================================

No. I didn't see that in your first paragraph. As written, it's confusing.

I do see your virtue-signalling.

And your I's and my.

Don't take it personal.

[greeneyes]

So I asked you what was your point(link below) in this overly long post that I found confusing. I also notice that several others were a bit confused and asking questions also.

http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3739051/posts?page=1513#1513

You posted this:
No. I didn’t see that in your first paragraph. As written, it’s confusing.
I do see your virtue-signalling.
And your I’s and my.
Don’t take it personal.
*************************************************************************************************
I agree that the first paragraph should have been written clearer. So I still am still wondering what is YOUR point in that initial response/link.

Don’t take WHAT personal? I have no idea what you are referencing.

Nor do I understand your reference to VIRTUE Signaling - which is a term that I use when referring to insincere DemocRATS pretending to care about anything or anyone.

Please, would you clarify your statements? It would be appreciated.